Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38221639›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2024

Real-World Treatment and Care Patterns in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating First-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy in the United States.

Colin Edgerton, Andrew Frick, Simon Helfgott, Kent Kwas Huston, Jasvinder A Singh, Patrick Zueger, Samuel I Anyanwu, Pankaj Patel, Nehad Soloman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin EdgertonArticularis Healthcare Group and American Rheumatology Network, Charleston, South Carolina.
Andrew FrickTrio Health Analytics, Louisville, Colorado.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-9382
Simon HelfgottBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kent Kwas HustonKansas City Physician Partners, Kansas City, Missouri.
Jasvinder A SinghUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-0006
Patrick ZuegerAbbVie Inc, Chicago, Illinois.
Samuel I AnyanwuAbbVie Inc, Chicago, Illinois.
Pankaj PatelAbbVie Inc, Chicago, Illinois.
Nehad SolomanArizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associates, Phoenix, Arizona.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

AbbVie
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTreatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend targeting low disease activity or remission and switching therapies for patients not reaching those targets. We evaluated real-world use of disease activity measures, treatment discontinuation, and switching patterns among patients with RA initiating a first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).

methodsData from adult patients with RA initiating a first-line TNFi were collected from the American Rheumatology Network (January 2014-August 2021). The proportion of patients with recorded disease activity scores (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] or Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]) at TNFi initiation was assessed. Among patients with moderate or severe RA at TNFi initiation, reasons for discontinuation and subsequent advanced therapy were evaluated.

resultsAmong TNFi initiators (n = 15,182), 44.8% recorded a CDAI/RAPID3 score at treatment initiation; of those who did not, 47.0% had recorded a tender and/or swollen joint count or pain score. Among patients with moderate or severe RA (n = 1,651), 52% discontinued their initial TNFi during follow-up, of which 15%, 46%, 28%, and 12% initiated the same TNFi, another TNFi, a non-TNFi biologic, or a Janus kinase inhibitor, respectively. The proportion of patients restarting the same TNFi or initiating another TNFi varied according to TNFi discontinuation reason.

conclusionIn clinical practice, over half of patients with RA initiating a first-line TNFi did not have baseline disease activity assessments. Many patients cycled through TNFi despite citing lack of efficacy as the most common reason for discontinuation. Consistent, objective monitoring of treatment response and timely switch to effective therapy is needed in patients with RA.

Identifiers

PMID38221639
PMCPMC11016569
OpenAlexW4390884364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.