ArticleEuropean radiology2024
CT-guided core needle biopsies of head and neck tumors: a comprehensive monocenter analysis of safety and outcomes.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time CT/MR fusion imaging-guided core needle biopsy: enhancing diagnostic precision in head and neck lesions.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- CT-guided core needle biopsy in ultrasound-inaccessible suprahyoid deep neck spaces.European radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance and Radio-Pathologic Correlation of Image-Guided Biopsy in Head and Neck Lesions: A Systematic Review : Short title: Diagnostic Performance and Radio-Pathologic Correlation of Image-Guided Biopsy in Head and Neck Lesions.Galen medical journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough core needle biopsy is an important tool in minimally invasive tissue sampling and diagnostics for head and neck masses, comprehensive data about safety and outcomes is lacking. PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of head and neck masses. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis retrospective single-center study included patients from 04/2007 to 12/2021, and a total of 156 core needle biopsies were evaluated. The initial histopathological results were compared with the long-term final diagnosis to evaluate the diagnostic yield of CT-guided core needle biopsies. The patients' age, sex, and history of malignancy, as well as procedural complications and radiation exposure were collected.
resultsA total of 156 biopsies of 150 patients (mean age 56 years ± 17; 89 men) were evaluated. 57.3% (86/150) of patients had a history of malignancy. 55.1% (86/156) of the lesions were accessed by an infrahyoid needle approach. 92.9% (145/156) of biopsies yielded conclusive results. There were no false positives and 4 false negatives, resulting in a total false negative rate of 2.7% (4/145) and a total diagnostic yield of 90.4% (141/156). There were nine puncture-related complications (9/156-5.7%). None of the complications required further reintervention. The average dose length product was 311.3 mGy × cm.
conclusionCT-guided core needle biopsies of head and neck masses showed excellent results with high diagnostic yield and clinical safety. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: General anesthesia for open biopsy carries a higher risk for elderly patients, and fine needle aspiration has a poor reputation in terms of its diagnostic yield. This study focuses on safety and diagnostic yield of CT-guided core needle biopsies. KEY POINTS: • CT-guided core needle biopsy in head and neck tumors was a reliable and safe procedure. • The most common cause for an inconclusive biopsy result was a shortage of tissue collected during the biopsy. • During our study period of nearly 15 years, the radiation exposure of head and neck biopsies decreased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38221584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.