Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38220240›Full record

Observational studySaudi medical journal2024

How do contraception preferences change over time?

Merve A Talmac, Seyma C Yuksek, Selim Afsar, Aysegul Bestel, Izel Gunay, Ismail Ozdemir

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Saudi medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Merve A TalmacFrom the Department of Gynecological Oncology (Talmac, Afsar); from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Gunay), Basaksehir Cam and Sakura State Hospital, University of Health Sciences, and from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Yuksek, Bestel, Ozdemir), Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7219-1772
Seyma C YuksekFrom the Department of Gynecological Oncology (Talmac, Afsar); from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Gunay), Basaksehir Cam and Sakura State Hospital, University of Health Sciences, and from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Yuksek, Bestel, Ozdemir), Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selim AfsarFrom the Department of Gynecological Oncology (Talmac, Afsar); from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Gunay), Basaksehir Cam and Sakura State Hospital, University of Health Sciences, and from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Yuksek, Bestel, Ozdemir), Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aysegul BestelFrom the Department of Gynecological Oncology (Talmac, Afsar); from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Gunay), Basaksehir Cam and Sakura State Hospital, University of Health Sciences, and from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Yuksek, Bestel, Ozdemir), Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Izel GunayFrom the Department of Gynecological Oncology (Talmac, Afsar); from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Gunay), Basaksehir Cam and Sakura State Hospital, University of Health Sciences, and from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Yuksek, Bestel, Ozdemir), Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ismail OzdemirFrom the Department of Gynecological Oncology (Talmac, Afsar); from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Gunay), Basaksehir Cam and Sakura State Hospital, University of Health Sciences, and from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Yuksek, Bestel, Ozdemir), Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
University of Health Science · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the contraceptive preferences of women based on their age and to track changes in these preferences over time.

methodsThis was an observational, retrospective cross-sectional study. Data from 2742 patients were evaluated for this study. The patient group of the first 4 years was classified as Group I (n=1371) and the last 4 years was classified as Group II (n=1371). The preferred contraception methods between the groups and their changes across the years were examined.

resultsCoitus interruptus was found to be the prevailing contraceptive method across all age groups, with 304 (70.9%) in 18-24 age group; 1314 (65.4%) in 25-40 age group; and 148 (48.8%) in 41-53 age group using this method. Breastfeeding rates were also analyzed across age groups, revealing that 11% of patients aged 18-24 years, 5% of patients aged 25-40 years, and 1.7% of patients aged 41-53 years were breastfeeding. Among these patients, 114 (74.5%) were not using any contraception method, while coitus interruptus remained the most popular choice.

conclusionIt was determined that there are many couples who do not have sufficient knowledge regarding family planning and birth control in our country. At the same time, the use of birth control methods has increased due to the increase in the education level of women and easier access to sexual health services.

Indexed as

ContraceptionAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersYoung Adultcontraceptioncontraceptive methodsfamily planning services

Identifiers

PMID38220240
PMCPMC10807679
OpenAlexW4390859684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.