GuidelineJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2024
SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.
Guideline in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07679009 (Evaluating the Safety and Diagnostic Utility of Cardiac MRI in Patients With Abandoned, Fractured Endocardial Leads or Permanent Epicardial Leads), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating the Safety and Diagnostic Utility of Cardiac MRI in Patients With Abandoned, Fractured Endocardial Leads or Permanent Epicardial Leads
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of late iodine enhancement on cardiac CT for myocardial tissue characterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- RF Power, BSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Future of Imaging in Heart Failure: Toward Precision Phenotyping, Integration, and Intelligence.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Prioritizing Discovery and Advancements in Arrhythmia Therapies: NIH/NHLBI Workshop.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2026Review
- Perioperative management of cardiac implantable electronic devices: a state of the art narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Cardiac MRI in cardiac dystrophinopathy: recommendations on imaging.Open heart · 2026Review
- The Initial Diagnostic Approach to Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Practical Imaging Pathway for General Cardiologists and Cardiac Imagers.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026Review
- Wideband black- and bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement imaging in patients with implantable cardiac devices at 1.5 T for improved visualization and localization of myocardial injury.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Wideband Pulse Sequences for Suppressing Image Artifacts in Children with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2025Article
- Cardiac implantable electronic device upgrades and downgrades: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Association (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Highly Accelerated Real-time Cine MRI Pulse Sequence for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Arrhythmias.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2025Article
- Recurrent cardiac lymphoma: cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a diagnostic key.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Predictors of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI image quality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- MRI safety in patients with abandoned temporary epicardial pacing wires: an eight-year retrospective study : Original Research Article.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation and Management of Nonischemic Cardiomyopathies.JACC. Heart failure · 2025Review
- Review
- Automated fibrosis segmentation from wideband post-contrastMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Athletic Individuals-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Aortic velocity measurements derived from phase-contrast MRI are influenced by a cardiac implantable electronic device in both adult and pediatric human subjects.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 20 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a proven imaging modality for informing diagnosis and prognosis, guiding therapeutic decisions, and risk stratifying surgical intervention. Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) would be expected to derive particular benefit from CMR given high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. While several guidelines have been published over the last 16 years, it is important to recognize that both the CIED and CMR technologies, as well as our knowledge in MR safety, have evolved rapidly during that period. Given increasing utilization of CIED over the past decades, there is an unmet need to establish a consensus statement that integrates latest evidence concerning MR safety and CIED and CMR technologies. While experienced centers currently perform CMR in CIED patients, broad availability of CMR in this population is lacking, partially due to limited availability of resources for programming devices and appropriate monitoring, but also related to knowledge gaps regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR in this growing population. To address the knowledge gaps, this SCMR Expert Consensus Statement integrates consensus guidelines, primary data, and opinions from experts across disparate fields towards the shared goal of informing evidenced-based decision-making regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR for patients with CIEDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.