Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38219857›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2024

Spectrum of Genetic Variants in the Most Common Genes Causing Inherited Retinal Disease in a Large Molecularly Characterized United Kingdom Cohort.

Siying Lin, Sandra Vermeirsch, Nikolas Pontikos, Maria Pilar Martin-Gutierrez, Malena Daich Varela, Samantha Malka, Elena Schiff, Hannah Knight, Genevieve Wright, Neringa Jurkute and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Genetic Landscape of Inherited Retinal Diseases in the Israeli Population.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Siying LinNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Sandra VermeirschNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Nikolas PontikosNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Maria Pilar Martin-GutierrezNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Malena Daich VarelaNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Samantha MalkaNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Elena SchiffNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Hannah KnightNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Genevieve WrightNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Neringa JurkuteNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neuro-Ophhalmology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Mark J SimcoeUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Patrick Yu-Wai-ManNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Mariya MoosajeeNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Michel MichaelidesNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Omar A MahrooNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom; Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew R WebsterNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Gavin ArnoNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom; UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: g.arno@ucl.ac.uk.
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 206619/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInherited retinal disease (IRD) is a leading cause of blindness. Recent advances in gene-directed therapies highlight the importance of understanding the genetic basis of these disorders. This study details the molecular spectrum in a large United Kingdom (UK) IRD patient cohort.

designRetrospective study of electronic patient records.

participantsPatients with IRD who attended the Genetics Service at Moorfields Eye Hospital between 2003 and July 2020, in whom a molecular diagnosis was identified.

methodsGenetic testing was undertaken via a combination of single-gene testing, gene panel testing, whole exome sequencing, and more recently, whole genome sequencing. Likely disease-causing variants were identified from entries within the genetics module of the hospital electronic patient record (OpenEyes Electronic Medical Record). Analysis was restricted to only genes listed in the Genomics England PanelApp R32 Retinal Disorders panel (version 3.24), which includes 412 genes associated with IRD. Manual curation ensured consistent variant annotation and included only plausible disease-associated variants.

main outcome measuresDetailed analysis was performed for variants in the 5 most frequent genes (ABCA4, USH2A, RPGR, PRPH2, and BEST1), as well as for the most common variants encountered in the IRD study cohort.

resultsWe identified 4415 individuals from 3953 families with molecularly diagnosed IRD (variants in 166 genes). Of the families, 42.7% had variants in 1 of the 5 most common IRD genes. Complex disease alleles contributed to disease in 16.9% of affected families with ABCA4-associated retinopathy. USH2A exon 13 variants were identified in 43% of affected individuals with USH2A-associated IRD. Of the RPGR variants, 71% were clustered in the ORF15 region. PRPH2 and BEST1 variants were associated with a range of dominant and recessive IRD phenotypes. Of the 20 most prevalent variants identified, 5 were not in the most common genes; these included founder variants in CNGB3, BBS1, TIMP3, EFEMP1, and RP1.

conclusionsWe describe the most common pathogenic IRD alleles in a large single-center multiethnic UK cohort and the burden of disease, in terms of families affected, attributable to these variants. Our findings will inform IRD diagnoses in future patients and help delineate the cohort of patients eligible for gene-directed therapies under development. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingRetinal DiseasesAdultDNAExome SequencingFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPedigreeRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomDNAGenotypesInherited retinal diseasePathogenic allelesVariant classificationVariants

Identifiers

PMID38219857
PMCPMC11932969
OpenAlexW4390889292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.