ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
Subxiphoid pericardial drainage for gastric tube ulcer penetrating the pericardium after esophagectomy: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful endoscopic drainage for gastropericardial fistula caused by a gastric conduit ulcer after esophagectomy.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionReconstructed gastric tube ulcers are common complications of esophagectomy. When the pericardium is penetrated, digestive juices can cause severe cardiac inflammation, leading to an extremely poor prognosis. We report the first case of pericardial penetration of a constructed stomach tube via the posterior mediastinal route and the first use of subxiphoid pericardial drainage and continuous irrigation lavage. PRESENTATION OF CASE: This case involved a 50-year-old woman who underwent an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer nine years prior with gastric tube reconstruction via the posterior mediastinal route. She developed pericardial penetration due to a gastric tube ulcer. Her respiratory and circulatory condition worsened, and pericardial drainage and a prophylactic tracheostomy were performed to prevent septic shock. A 5-cm longitudinal incision was made in the epigastric region, and a 4-cm T-shaped incision was made through the pericardium. Two double-lumen drainage tubes were placed in the anterior and posterior pericardium, and continuous irrigation was initiated via each tube. We successfully treated the patient without complications using subxiphoid pericardial drainage and continuous irrigation lavage, and she was discharged on postoperative day 23. DISCUSSION: We presented this case to discuss surgical techniques and optimal treatment strategies.
conclusionSubxiphoid pericardial drainage and continuous irrigational lavage are effective for pericardial penetration of a constructed stomach tube via the posterior mediastinal route.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.