Observational studyInternational urology and nephrology2024
Objectified kidney ultrasound echogenicity and size metrics as potential predictors for kidney function in children.
Observational study in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKidney echogenicity is typically determined subjectively but may have a quantifiable relationship to kidney function. Similarly, kidney length has been shown to correlate with kidney function. This study sought to quantify echogenicity using readily available software. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between quantified echogenicity and kidney length to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in children with acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).
methodsIn a single-center retrospective observational study, echogenicity index (EI) was determined using a ratio of right kidney to liver mean pixel density. The kidney length ratio (KLR) was determined by the actual to predicted lengths of both kidneys. Both variables were correlated to eGFR using correlation analyses and predictive capacity was determined with receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.
resultsOf 94 subjects, 46% (43/94) had AKI, 28% (26/95) had CKD and 26% (25/95) were controls. The higher the EI the lower the eGFR (r = - 0.46, p < 0.0001). EI between 1.0 and 1.1 predicted an eGFR < 90 ml/min/1.73m
conclusionWe have developed an accessible methodology to quantify kidney echogenicity. Overall, there was an inverse correlation between EI and eGFR in pediatric CKD and AKI. However, these correlations did not persist within subgroups which could be due to small sample size and heterogeneity of etiologies. Overall, KLR had a weaker correlation to eGFR, compared to EI. Despite these correlations, both EI and KLR had "fair" to "good" performance as a biomarker for an eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m
Indexed as
Identifiers
38219260What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.