Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38219255›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Effect of supplementing a Bacillus subtilis-based probiotic on performance, intestinal integrity, and serum antioxidant capacity and metabolites concentrations of heat-stressed growing pigs.

Fernanda González, Miguel Cervantes, Adriana Morales, José Alan Valle, Reyna Lucero Camacho, A Ngélica Morales-Becerra, Hugo Bernal, Santa M Aría Mendoza, John K Htoo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Impact ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernanda GonzálezInstituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, BC, México.
Miguel CervantesInstituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, BC, México.
Adriana MoralesInstituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, BC, México.
José Alan ValleInstituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, BC, México.
Reyna Lucero CamachoInstituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, BC, México.
A Ngélica Morales-BecerraInstituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, BC, México.
Hugo BernalFacultad de Agronomía, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, NL, México.
Santa M Aría MendozaEvonik Operations GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany.
John K HtooEvonik Operations GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany.
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California · MXEvonik (Germany) · DEUniversidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposing pigs to heat stress (HS) seems to modify the intestinal microbiota which may compromise the integrity of the small intestine epithelia. Probiotics, live microorganisms, can help pigs to maintain a healthy intestinal environment. Eighty pigs (21.6 ± 3.4 kg body weight) exposed to HS or thermal neutral (TN) conditions were used to evaluate the effect of a Bacillus subtilis-based probiotic on performance, body temperature, and intestinal integrity. Treatments were: TN pigs fed a control diet without (TN-C) or with 1 × 106 CFU probiotic/g of feed (TN-P), and HS pigs fed a control without (HS-C) or with probiotic (HS-P). The control diet was formulated with wheat, soybean meal, and free amino acids (AA). Feed and water were freely available during the 21-d study. At completion, samples from duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were collected to analyze epithelial histology and tight junction protein expression; antioxidant activity, and free AA and metabolites in serum. Relative abundance of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Escherichia coli, and Bacillus in ileal content was analyzed. Ambient temperature in the TN room ranged from 19 to 25 °C, and in HS room from 30 to 38.5 °C. Intestinal temperature in HS-P pigs was lower than in HS-C pigs. Weight gain and feed intake reduced, but feed:gain and respiration rate increased in HS compared to TN pigs, regardless of diet (P < 0.01). Probiotic increased weight gain and improved feed:gain (P < 0.05) in both TN and HS pigs, but feed intake did not differ. Heat stress decreased villi height in jejunum and villi height:crypt depth in duodenum and jejunum (P < 0.05). Probiotic increased villi height in duodenum and ileum, and villi height:crypt depth in all small intestine segments (P < 0.05). Relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium tended to reduce, and E. coli tended to increase (P < 0.10) in ileal content of HS-C pigs. Ileal relative abundance of Bacillus was higher (P < 0.01) in HS-P pigs than in HS-C and TN-C pigs. Cystathionine, homocysteine, hydroxylysine, α-amino-adipic acid, citrulline, α-amino-n-butyric acid, P-Ser, and taurine were higher in HS than in TN pigs (P < 0.05). These data confirm the negative effect of HS on performance, body temperature, and intestinal integrity of pigs. These data suggest that supplementing 1 × 106 CFU probiotic/g of feed based on Bacillus subtilis DSM 32540 may help to counteract the negative effects of HS on the performance and intestinal integrity of pigs.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsBacillus subtilisCitrullineDietEscherichia coliHeat-Shock ResponseHot TemperatureSwineWeight GainAntioxidantsCitrullineheat stressintestinal integrityperformancepigsprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID38219255
PMCPMC10825842
OpenAlexW4390858587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.