ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Staging liver fibrosis: comparison of radiomics model and fusion model based on multiparametric MRI in patients with chronic liver disease.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal artificial intelligence models for liver fibrosis staging: a scoping review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Predictive value of liver fibrosis markers and model for end-stage liver disease score in evaluating the degree of esophageal and gastric varices in cirrhosis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of methodological radiomics score (METRICS): an intra- and inter-rater reliability study endorsed by EuSoMII.European radiology · 2025Article
- Current Update on DWI-MRI and Its Radiomics in Liver Fibrosis-A Review of the Literature.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
- Noninvasive Grading of Liver Fibrosis Based on Texture Analysis From MRI-Derived Radiomics.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of EfficientNetV2-S method for staging liver fibrosis based on multiparametric MRI.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and compare radiomics model and fusion model based on multiple MR parameters for staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with chronic liver disease who underwent multiparametric abdominal MRI were included in this retrospective study. Multiparametric MR images were imported into 3D-Slicer software for drawing bounding boxes on MR images. By using a 3D-Slicer extension of SlicerRadiomics, radiomics features were extracted from these MR images. The z-score normalization method was used for post-processing radiomics features. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method (LASSO) was performed for selecting significant radiomics features. The logistic regression analysis was used for building the radiomics model. A fusion model was built by integrating serum fibrosis biomarkers of aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) with radiomics signatures.
resultsIn the training cohort, AUCs of radiomics and fusion model were 0.707-0.842 and 0.718-0.854 for differentiating different groups. In the testing cohort, AUCs were 0.514-0.724 and 0.609-0.728. For the training cohort, there was no significant difference of AUCs between radiomics and fusion model (p > 0.05). For the testing cohort, AUCs of fusion model were higher than those of radiomics model in differentiating F1-3 vs. F4 and F1-2 vs. F4 (p = 0.011 & 0.042).
conclusionsRadiomics model and fusion model based on multiparametric MRI exhibited the feasibility for staging liver fibrosis in patients with CLD, and APRI and FIB-4 could improve the diagnostic performance of radiomics model in differentiating F1-3 vs. F4 and F1-2 vs. F4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.