Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38219038›Full record

Trial reportEuropean endodontic journal2023

Effect of Cooling of Lidocaine with Epinephrine on the Anesthetic Success of Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Primary Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Vivek Aggarwal, Mamta Singla, Masoud Saatchi, Alpa Gupta, Mukesh Hasija, Babita Meena

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European endodontic journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vivek AggarwalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jamia Millia Islamia, Faculty of Dentistry, New Delhi, India.
Mamta SinglaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SGT Dental College, Gurgaon, India.
Masoud SaatchiDepartment of Endodontics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan, Iran.
Alpa GuptaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabaad, India.
Mukesh HasijaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jamia Millia Islamia, Faculty of Dentistry, New Delhi, India.
Babita MeenaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jamia Millia Islamia, Faculty of Dentistry, New Delhi, India.
Jamia Millia Islamia · INIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRManav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies · INShree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of cooling a 2% lidocaine solution with 1: 200,000 epinephrine, administered as a supplementary intraligamentary injection to overcome a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).

methodsThe study was preceded by a pilot study to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of plain lidocaine solutions given as intraligamentary injections. In the subsequent randomized clinical trial, one hundred and thirty-eight patients received IANB with 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine for endodontic man- agement of a mandibular molar with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Eighty-eight patients reported pain greater than 54 mm on a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS) were categorized as unsuccessful anesthesia. These patients received either of the following intraligamentary injections: 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine at room temperature; or 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine at 4°C. Anes- thetic success was again evaluated after re-initiation of the endodontic treatment. The heart rates of the patients were measured using a finger pulse oximeter. The categorical success rates were statistically analyzed with the Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate measurements were analyzed using a t-test.

resultsThe intraligamentary injections with anesthetic solutions at room temperature presented a suc- cess rate of 59.1%, while the injections with a solution at 4°C gave a success rate of 52.27%. There were no significant differences between the success rates of the groups (χ2=0.41, p=0.52). Regarding the heart rates, there were no differences between the two solutions at baseline (T=1.2, p=0.2) or after injections (T=0.64, p=0.52).

conclusionReducing the temperature of 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine to 4°C does not affect the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injections, given after a failed primary IANB. (EEJ-2023-03-044).

Indexed as

LidocaineNerve BlockAnesthetics, LocalEpinephrineHumansMandibular NervePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalEpinephrineLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID38219038
PMCPMC10500213
OpenAlexW4385978641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.