Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38218936›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2024

Feasibility and acceptability of phone-delivered psychological therapy for refugee children and adolescents in a humanitarian setting.

Fiona S McEwen, Hania El Khatib, Kristin Hadfield, Karen Pluess, Nicolas Chehade, Tania Bosqui, Stephanie Skavenski, Laura Murray, Roland Weierstall-Pust, Elie Karam and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03887312 (Development, Piloting and Evaluation of a Phone-Delivered Psychological Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03887312 nacompletednot on this map

Development, Piloting and Evaluation of a Phone-Delivered Psychological Intervention (t-CETA) for Syrian Refugee Children in Lebanon: Phase II

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan2019 to 2020Enrolled21ConditionsDepression, Anxiety, PTSD, Conduct DisorderArmst-CETA, Médecins du Monde treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Fiona S McEwen *Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Science, G.E. Fogg Building, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK.
Hania El Khatib *Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Science, G.E. Fogg Building, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK.
Kristin Hadfield *Trinity Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Karen PluessBiological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Science, G.E. Fogg Building, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK.
Nicolas ChehadeMédecins du Monde, Beirut, Lebanon.
Tania BosquiTrinity Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Stephanie SkavenskiJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Laura MurrayJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Roland Weierstall-PustMedical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Elie KaramInstitute for Development, Research, Advocacy and Applied Care, Achrafieh, St. George Hospital Street, Beirut, Lebanon.
Michael PluessBiological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Science, G.E. Fogg Building, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK. m.pluess@surrey.ac.uk.
Johns Hopkins University · USQueen Mary University of London · GBAmerican University of Beirut · LBKing's College London · GBMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DESaint George Hospital · LBTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Biological Pathways of Risk and Resilience in Syrian Refugee ChildrenR01HD083387 · NICHD · UNIV/LONDON-QUEEN MARY& WESTFIELD COLL · PI KARAM, ELIE GEORGES, PLUESS, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRefugee children are at high risk of mental health problems but face barriers to accessing mental health services, a problem exacerbated by a shortage of mental health professionals. Having trained lay counsellors deliver therapy via telephone could overcome these barriers. This is the first study to explore feasibility and acceptability of telephone-delivered therapy with refugee children in a humanitarian setting.

methodsAn evidence-based intervention, Common Elements Treatment Approach, was adapted for telephone-delivery (t-CETA) and delivered by lay counsellors to Syrian refugee children in informal tented settlements in the Beqaa region of Lebanon. Following delivery of t-CETA, semi-structured interviews were conducted with counsellors (N = 3) and with children who received t-CETA (N = 11, 45% female, age 8-17 years) and their caregivers (N = 11, 100% female, age 29-56 years) (N = 25 interviews). Thematic content analysis was conducted separately for interviews with counsellors and interviews with families and results were synthesized.

resultsThree themes emerged from interviews with counsellors and four themes from interviews with families, with substantial overlap between them. Synthesized themes were: counselling over the phone both solves and creates practical and logistical challenges; t-CETA is adapted to potential cultural blocks; the relationship between the counsellor and the child and caregiver is extremely important; the family's attitude to mental health influences their understanding of and engagement with counselling; and t-CETA works and is needed. Counselling over the phone overcame logistical barriers, such as poor transportation, and cultural barriers, such as stigma associated with attending mental health services. It provided a more flexible and accessible service and resulted in reductions in symptoms for many children. Challenges included access to phones and poor network coverage, finding an appropriate space, and communication challenges over the phone.

conclusionsDespite some challenges, telephone-delivered therapy for children shows promising evidence of feasibility and acceptability in a humanitarian context and has the potential to increase access to mental health services by hard-to-reach populations. Approaches to addressing challenges of telephone-delivered therapy are discussed. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03887312; registered 22nd March 2019.

Indexed as

Children and adolescentsFeasibility and acceptabilityLay counsellorsRefugeesTelephoneTelepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID38218936
PMCPMC10787498
OpenAlexW4390840458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.