Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38218862›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2024

A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis comparing nonoperative versus operative management for uncomplicated appendicitis: a focus on randomized controlled trials.

Francesco Brucchi, Greta Bracchetti, Paola Fugazzola, Jacopo Viganò, Claudia Filisetti, Luca Ansaloni, Francesca Dal Mas, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Piergiorgio Danelli

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Appendicitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Validation of Nonselective Conservative Treatment for Pediatric Acute Appendicitis.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco BrucchiUniversity of Milan, Via Festa Del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. francesco.brucchi@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3191-4369
Greta BracchettiUniversity of Milan, Via Festa Del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6562-8152
Paola FugazzolaUnit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-9276
Jacopo ViganòUnit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2319-5475
Claudia FilisettiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Buzzi Children's Hospital, 20154, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3181-7737
Luca AnsaloniUnit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6427-0307
Francesca Dal MasDepartment of Management, Università Ca' Foscari, Dorsoduro 3246, 30123, Venezia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6477-4177
Lorenzo CobianchiUnit of General Surgery I, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6773-5453
Piergiorgio DanelliDivision of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, L. Sacco University Hospital, 20157, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1461-9835
University of Milan · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITCa' Foscari University of Venice · ITOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to provide a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing conservative and surgical treatment in a population of adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

methodsA systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. We have exclusively incorporated randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies involving participants with complicated appendicitis or children were excluded. The variables considered are as follows: treatment complications, complication-free treatment success at index admission and at 1 year follow-up, length of hospital stay (LOS), quality of life (QoL) and costs.

resultsEight RCTs involving 3213 participants (1615 antibiotics/1598 appendectomy) were included. There was no significant difference between the two treatments in terms of complication rates (RR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.61-1.04, P = 0.07, I

conclusionsAs further large-scale trials have been conducted, antibiotic therapy proved to be safe, less expensive, but also less effective than surgical treatment. In order to ensure well-informed decisions, further research is needed to explore patient preferences and quality of life outcomes.

Indexed as

AppendicitisAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendectomyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAcute appendicitisAntibioticAppendectomyMeta-analysisNonoperative treatment

Identifiers

PMID38218862
PMCPMC10787963
OpenAlexW4390837705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.