ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Odontoid incidence: a constant cervical anatomical feature evident in standing plain radiographs and supine magnetic resonance images.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semi-quantitative assessment of paraspinal muscle fat infiltration in single-level C5-6 cervical spondylosis using gray-level thresholding on conventional MRI: associations with disc degeneration and posture-related segmental angular change.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Odontoid parameters in subjects with and without degenerative cervical spondylosis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- The effect of cervical spine flexion-extension motion on odontoid parameters.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Analysis of odontoid parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with different curve types.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess whether there is a difference between measurements of odontoid incidence (OI) and other cervical sagittal parameters by X-ray radiography and those by supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
methodsStanding X-ray and supine MRI images of 42 healthy subjects were retrospectively analyzed. Surgimap software was employed to measure cervical sagittal parameters including OI, odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope (C2S), C0-2 angle, C2-7 angle, T1 slope (T1S) and T1S-cervical lordosis (CL). Paired samples t-test was applied to determine the difference between parameters measured by standing X-ray and those by supine MRI. In addition, the statistical correlation between the parameters were compared. The prediction of CL was performed and validated using the formula CL = 0.36 × OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S.
resultsSignificant correlations and differences were found between cervical sagittal parameters determined by X-ray and those by MRI. OI was verified to be a constant anatomic parameter and the formula CL = 0.36 × OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S can be used to predict CL in cervical sagittal parameters.
conclusionsOI is verified as a constant anatomic parameter, demonstrating the necessity of a combined assessment of cervical sagittal balance by using standing X-ray and supine MRI. The formula CL = 0.36 × OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S can be applied to predict CL in cervical sagittal parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.