Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38217788›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

The Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (ESSQ-19): Italian language translation and validation.

Margherita Burani, Giada Giovannini, Matteo Pugnaghi, Niccolò Orlandi, Maria Cristina Cioclu, Anna Elisabetta Vaudano, Elisa Moriconi, Giacomo Pavesi, Stefano Meletti

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Margherita BuraniNeurology Unit, OCB Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Giada GiovanniniNeurology Unit, OCB Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Di Modena, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3585-5872
Matteo PugnaghiNeurology Unit, OCB Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Di Modena, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-6247
Niccolò OrlandiNeurology Unit, OCB Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Di Modena, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5717-7363
Maria Cristina CiocluDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Science, Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Anna Elisabetta VaudanoNeurology Unit, OCB Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Di Modena, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6280-7526
Elisa MoriconiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Science, Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Giacomo PavesiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Science, Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Stefano MelettiNeurology Unit, OCB Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Di Modena, Modena, Italy. stefano.meletti@unimore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-539X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEpilepsy surgery can be proposed as a treatment option in people with focal epilepsy, however satisfaction with epilepsy surgery in Italy remains unknown. We aimed to validate in Italy an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery, the 19-item Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (ESSQ-19).

methodsConsecutive patients with epilepsy who received epilepsy surgery between the years 2018-2021 at Modena Academic Hospital were recruited and provided clinical and demographic data. The Italian version of the ESSQ-19 and other three questionnaires were completed to assess construct validity. To evaluate the validity and reliability of the tool Spearman's rank correlation, and internal consistency analysis were performed.

results66 out of 79 eligible patients participated in the study (22 females; median age 37 years). The mean values of satisfaction for each domain of the IT-ESSQ-19 were: seizure control 83.4; (SD 16.7), psychosocial functioning 79.3 (SD 17.1), surgical complications 90.8 (SD 14.9), and recovery from surgery 81.4 (SD 16.9). The mean summary score was 83.7 (SD 13.3). The questionnaire was shown to have high internal consistency in the four domains (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82-0.93), and no significant floor/ceiling effects of the summary score. The ESSQ-19 scores significantly correlated with other instruments to support construct validity. It also demonstrated good discriminant validity for being seizure free [AUC 0.72; 95% CI = 0.56-0.88], and to endorse depression [AUC 0.76, 95% CI = 0.56-0.96]. SIGNIFICANCE: The Italian version of the ESSQ-19 is a reliable and valid self-reported questionnaire for assessing patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery.

Indexed as

EpilepsyPatient SatisfactionAdultFemaleHumansItalyLanguageMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingTranslationsYoung AdultEpilepsyEpilepsy surgeryPatient reported outcomesQuality of lifeSatisfaction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.