Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38217743›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of urolithiasis: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training-Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group.

Gernot Ortner, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Selcuk Güven, Gerhard Kitzbichler, Olivier Traxer, Guido Giusti, Silvia Proietti, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Amy Krambeck and 23 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Gernot OrtnerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T., Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria. gerni_o@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2454-6599
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England.
Selcuk GüvenDepartment of Urology, Meram School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Gerhard KitzbichlerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T., Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Olivier TraxerSorbonne University, GRC N°20 Lithiase Renale, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.
Guido GiustiDepartment of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Silvia ProiettiDepartment of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Amy KrambeckNorthwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ioannis Kartalas GoumasDepartment of Urology, Istituto Clinico Beato Matteo, Vigevano, Italy.
Mordechai DuvdevaniDepartment of Urology, Hadassah Ein-Kerem University Hospital, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Guido M KamphuisDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefania FerrettiDepartment of Urology, Hospital, University of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Laurian DragosCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Khurshid GhaniDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Arkadiusz MiernikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Patrick Juliebø-JonesDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Helene JungDepartment of Urology, Hospital Lillebaelt, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Thomas TaillyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Amelia PietropaoloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England.
Saeed Bin HamriUrology Department at Specialized Medical Center SMC2, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Athanasios Papatsoris2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Kemal SaricaDepartment of Urology, Medical School, Health Sciences University, Prof Dr I. Varank Training and Educational Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cesare Marco ScoffoneDepartment of Urology, Cottolengo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Cecilia Maria CraccoDepartment of Urology, Cottolengo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Etienne Xavier KellerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Otas DurutovicDepartment of Urology, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Sergio PereiraDepartment of Urology, North Lisbon University Hospital, Lisbon School of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal.
Thomas R W HerrmannTraining and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Udo NageleDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall I.T., Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Ali Serdar GözenDepartment of Urology, Medius Kliniken, Ruit, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Theodoros TokasTraining and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify laser lithotripsy settings used by experts for specific clinical scenarios and to identify preventive measures to reduce complications.

methodsAfter literature research to identify relevant questions, a survey was conducted and sent to laser experts. Participants were asked for preferred laser settings during specific clinical lithotripsy scenarios. Different settings were compared for the reported laser types, and common settings and preventive measures were identified.

resultsTwenty-six laser experts fully returned the survey. Holmium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) was the primary laser used (88%), followed by thulium fiber laser (TFL) (42%) and pulsed thulium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Tm:YAG) (23%). For most scenarios, we could not identify relevant differences among laser settings. However, the laser power was significantly different for middle-ureteral (p = 0.027), pelvic (p = 0.047), and lower pole stone (p = 0.018) lithotripsy. Fragmentation or a combined fragmentation with dusting was more common for Ho:YAG and pulsed Tm:YAG lasers, whereas dusting or a combination of dusting and fragmentation was more common for TFL lasers. Experts prefer long pulse modes for Ho:YAG lasers to short pulse modes for TFL lasers. Thermal injury due to temperature development during lithotripsy is seriously considered by experts, with preventive measures applied routinely.

conclusionsLaser settings do not vary significantly between commonly used lasers for lithotripsy. Lithotripsy techniques and settings mainly depend on the generated laser pulse's and generator settings' physical characteristics. Preventive measures such as maximum power limits, intermittent laser activation, and ureteral access sheaths are commonly used by experts to decrease thermal injury-caused complications.

Indexed as

AluminumLasers, Solid-StateLithotripsy, LaserUrolithiasisYttriumHolmiumHumansTechnologyThuliumAluminumHolmiumThuliumYttriumyttrium-aluminum-garnetLaserLithiasisSettingsStoneSurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.