Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38217706›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2024

Ultrasound imaging of male urethral stricture disease: a narrative review of the available evidence, focusing on selected prospective studies.

Mikołaj Frankiewicz, Malte W Vetterlein, Karolina Markiet, Jan Adamowicz, Felix Campos-Juanatey, Andrea Cocci, Clemens M Rosenbaum, Wesley Verla, Marjan Waterloos, Guglielmo Mantica and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Mikołaj FrankiewiczDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Malte W VetterleinDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. m.vetterlein@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5987-3883
Karolina MarkietDepartment of Urology, Department of Radiology, University Clinical Centre in Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Jan AdamowiczDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Felix Campos-JuanateyAndrology and Reconstructive Urology Unit, School of Medicine, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Cantabria University, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Andrea CocciDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Clemens M RosenbaumDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Wesley VerlaDepartment of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Marjan WaterloosDepartment of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Guglielmo ManticaIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Marcin MatuszewskiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Trauma and Reconstructive Urology Working Party of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists
Gdańsk Medical University · PLGhent University Hospital · BEAsklepios Klinik Barmbek · DEAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITNicolaus Copernicus University · PLOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversidad de Cantabria · ESUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Clinical Centre · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo synthetize the current scientific knowledge on the use of ultrasound of the male urethra for evaluation of urethral stricture disease. This review aims to provide a detailed description of the technical aspects of ultrasonography, and provides some indications on clinical applications of it, based on the evidence available from the selected prospective studies. Advantages and limitations of the technique are also provided.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed using the Medline and Cochrane databases on October 2022. The articles were searched using the keywords "sonourethrography", "urethral ultrasound", "urethral stricture" and "SUG". Only human studies and articles in English were included. Articles were screened by two reviewers (M.F. and K.M.).

resultsOur literature search reporting on the role of sonourethrography in evaluating urethral strictures resulted in selection of 17 studies, all prospective, even if of limited quality due to the small patients' number (varied from 28 to 113). Nine studies included patients with urethral stricture located in anterior urethra and eight studies included patients regardless of the stricture location. Final analysis was based on selected prospective studies, whose power was limited by the small patients' groups.

conclusionSonourethrography is a cost-effective and safe technique allowing for a dynamic and three-dimensional urethra assessment. Yet, because of its limited value in detecting posterior urethral strictures, the standard urethrography should remain the basic 'road-map' prior to surgery. It is an operator-dependent technique, which can provide detailed information on the length, location, and extent of spongiofibrosis without risks of exposure to ionizing radiation.

Indexed as

Urethral StrictureConstriction, PathologicHumansMaleProspective StudiesRadiographyUltrasonographyUrethraSonourethrographySUGUrethra imagingUrethral strictureUrethral ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38217706
PMCPMC10787903
OpenAlexW4390839000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.