Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38217695›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Are sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements related to later developmental functioning outcomes? A cohort study.

Bilge N Yardımcı-Lokmanoğlu, Numan Demir, Doğan Porsnok, Gülsen Sırtbaş-Işık, Emre Cengiz, Selen Serel-Arslan, Akmer Mutlu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bilge N Yardımcı-LokmanoğluHacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, Ankara, Türkiye. bilgenuryardimci@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5090-6658
Numan DemirHacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Swallowing Disorders Unit, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-0237
Doğan PorsnokHacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9936-0580
Gülsen Sırtbaş-IşıkHacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-7988
Emre CengizHacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Swallowing Disorders Unit, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9224-6742
Selen Serel-ArslanHacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Swallowing Disorders Unit, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2463-7503
Akmer MutluHacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-1750
Hacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements have an important role in the determination of later developmental problems, but the relationship of the two together with long-term outcomes has not been investigated. The objectives of this study were to (i) examine the relationship between sucking patterns using the Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS) and fidgety movements and other movement patterns using detailed General Movements Assessment (GMA), and (ii) investigate the relationship between these early assessment methods and developmental functioning outcomes at later ages. We analyzed the NOMAS from 34 weeks' postmenstrual age up to 10 weeks post-term and GMA between 9 and 20 weeks post-term age, and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition (Bayley-III) was applied for the developmental functioning outcomes to 62 infants (61%, 62/102) between 12 and 42 months of age. Among 102 infants at-risk, 70 (69%) showed a normal sucking pattern, and 85 (83%) had fidgety movements. The median Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R), as determined by GMA, of all infants was 24. The NOMAS was related to the MOS-R and its subcategories (p < 0.05) in all infants at-risk. The NOMAS, MOS-R and its subcategories were also related to cognitive, language, and motor development at later ages according to Bayley-III (p < 0.05).   Conclusion: This longitudinal study showed that the quality of sucking patterns, fidgety movements, and MOS-R were related to later developmental functioning, indicating that abnormal sucking patterns, aberrant fidgety movements, and lower MOS-R might predict developmental disorders. What is Known: • Sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements in which central pattern generators play an important role are related. • Sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements might be used separately to predict developmental outcomes. What is New: • Sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements, when used together, were related to later developmental functioning, including cognitive, language, and motor development in at-risk infants. • Predictive value of sucking patterns was lower for each developmental functioning outcome than early spontaneous movements.

Indexed as

NomaChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEatingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMovementDevelopmental functioningEarly spontaneous movementsFidgety movementsGeneral movementsSucking pattern

Identifiers

PMID38217695
PMCPMC10951042
OpenAlexW4390839597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.