Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38217694›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024

Conservative or surgical management of orbital schwannomas: a population-based case series.

Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Aman Singh, Cecilia Norin, Erik Edström, Elin Bohman, Adrian Elmi-Terander

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Schwannoma in the Anterior Orbit: Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victor Gabriel El-HajjDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aman SinghDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cecilia NorinDivision of Ophthalmology and Vision, St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik EdströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elin BohmanDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Adrian Elmi-TeranderDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. adrian.elmi.terander@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-3776-6136
Karolinska Institutet · SES:t Eriks Ögonsjukhus · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOrbital schwannomas (OS) are rare occurrences with no more than 500 cases reported in the literature. The tumor's potential to compromise the delicate neuro-ophthalmic structures within the orbit prompts surgical removal. Tumor removal is performed by ophthalmologists, often requiring a multidisciplinary surgical approach. The literature contains a very limited number of cases managed non-surgically. However, the inherent risks of orbital surgery warrant a comparison of the outcomes of conservative and surgical management strategies.

aimsTo review the national Swedish experience with the management of orbital schwannomas.

methodsThe study center is the primary Swedish referral center for the multidisciplinary management of orbital tumors, including schwannomas. During the period of 2005 to 2021, 16 patients with an OS diagnosis were managed at the center.

resultsFour patients initially underwent surgery where gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in three (75%) and subtotal resection (STR) in one (25%) case. The remaining 12 patients, who had a low risk of neuro-ophthalmic impairment, were managed conservatively with radiological and clinical examinations at regular intervals. After an average follow-up of 17 months, surgery was performed in three of these cases (25%). No recurrences or tumor growths were detected on radiological follow-ups (mean 50 months), and all patients experienced postoperative improvement at clinical follow-up (mean 65 months). The remainder of the conservatively treated patients (n=9) experienced no clinical progression (mean 30 months). A slight radiological tumor progression was detected in one patient after 17 months.

conclusionThere were no differences in long-term outcome between patients who had been managed with early surgery and those operated later after an initially conservative management. Conservatively treated patients had minimal to no symptoms and remained clinically stable throughout the follow-up period. Based on these findings, conservative management may successfully be adopted in cases with mild symptoms, no signs of compressive optic neuropathy and low risk of neuro-ophthalmic impairment. Conversion to surgical management is indicated upon clinical deterioration or tumor growth. Based on the findings of this study a decision tree for the management of orbital schwannomas is suggested.

Indexed as

Eye NeoplasmsNeurilemmomaOrbital NeoplasmsHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresResearchRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeOrbitOrbital schwannomasSchwannomasSurgeryWatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID38217694
PMCPMC10787905
OpenAlexW4390840726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.