ArticleClinical oral investigations2024
A bibliometric and Altmetric analysis of the 100 top most cited articles on dentin adhesives.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Top-cited articles on vital pulp therapy for irreversible pulpitis in permanent teeth: a bibliometric analysis.Odontology · 2026Article
- Odontology (2005-2025): historical perspectives and publication trends based on a metric-based analysis.Odontology · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited case reports and case series in dentistry.European oral research · 2026Article
- Bibliometric Mapping of Quercetin Research: Analysis of the Most-Cited Articles (2000-2023).Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Research Trends in Class II Malocclusion Treatment in Growing Individuals: A Bibliometric Study.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Resin-based adhesives, composites, and luting agents: Investigation of article citations and altmetrics.Brazilian oral research · 2025Article
- What are the global trends in research on resin infiltration in dentistry? An altmetric and bibliometric analysis.Brazilian oral research · 2025Article
- Social interest in publications on bruxism: an altmetric analysis.Brazilian oral research · 2025Article
- The Top 100 Most-Cited Articles on Religion from 2010 to 2023: A Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis.Journal of religion and health · 2024Article
- Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited literature.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify the 100 top-cited articles on dentin adhesives utilizing comprehensive bibliometric and altmetric analyses. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe Institute of Scientific Information Web of Knowledge database was used to compile the top-cited articles published from 1945 through February 12, 2023. Citation counts were manually retrieved for each article from Scopus, Google Scholar, Dimensions, and Altmetric. The articles were analyzed in terms of their number of citations, year, journal name, author (name, institution, and country), and type and specific field of study. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the results.
resultsThe analysis revealed that the top 100 cited articles originated from 18 English-language journals and collectively accumulated a remarkable 34526 citations. The article with the highest number of citations garnered 1288 references. Among authors, Van Meerbeek B. stood out with nine articles and 4650 citations, followed by Pashley D.H. with six articles and 2769 citations. Japan was the leading contributor by country, while the Catholic University of Leuven led in terms of institutions with 20 articles.
conclusionAccording to this study, basic research and review articles garnered the most citations, respectively. The citation analysis revealed different trends for researchers, the first being that researchers have focused on basic fields such as the ultramorphology of dentin and adhesive interfaces, followed by bond strength to dentin. Two studies on clinical experiences suggested that studies with high-level evidence, such as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or randomized controlled clinical trials, are required. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is identified that more studies with high-level evidence-based research are needed in the field of dental adhesives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.