Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38217685›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2024

A bibliometric and Altmetric analysis of the 100 top most cited articles on dentin adhesives.

Ferda Karabay, Mustafa Demirci, Safa Tuncer, Neslihan Tekçe, Meriç Berkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ferda KarabayDeparment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey. ferdagecgel@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6894-5807
Mustafa DemirciDeparment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5585-1935
Safa TuncerDeparment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2101-3225
Neslihan TekçeDeparment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-3159
Meriç BerkmanDeparment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-4868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to identify the 100 top-cited articles on dentin adhesives utilizing comprehensive bibliometric and altmetric analyses. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Institute of Scientific Information Web of Knowledge database was used to compile the top-cited articles published from 1945 through February 12, 2023. Citation counts were manually retrieved for each article from Scopus, Google Scholar, Dimensions, and Altmetric. The articles were analyzed in terms of their number of citations, year, journal name, author (name, institution, and country), and type and specific field of study. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the results.

resultsThe analysis revealed that the top 100 cited articles originated from 18 English-language journals and collectively accumulated a remarkable 34526 citations. The article with the highest number of citations garnered 1288 references. Among authors, Van Meerbeek B. stood out with nine articles and 4650 citations, followed by Pashley D.H. with six articles and 2769 citations. Japan was the leading contributor by country, while the Catholic University of Leuven led in terms of institutions with 20 articles.

conclusionAccording to this study, basic research and review articles garnered the most citations, respectively. The citation analysis revealed different trends for researchers, the first being that researchers have focused on basic fields such as the ultramorphology of dentin and adhesive interfaces, followed by bond strength to dentin. Two studies on clinical experiences suggested that studies with high-level evidence, such as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or randomized controlled clinical trials, are required. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is identified that more studies with high-level evidence-based research are needed in the field of dental adhesives.

Indexed as

AltmetricsBibliometricsDentinJapanAltmetricBibliometricCitation analysisDentin adhesiveRestorative dentistry

Identifiers

PMID38217685
PMCPMC10787682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.