ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2024
A Prospective Open-Label Dose-Response Study to Correct Vitamin D Deficiency in Cirrhosis.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intersections of vitamin D deficiency, HIV and chronic liver diseases.HIV medicine · 2026Review
- Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Status in Adolescents With Anxiety Disorders: A Case-Control and Vitamin D Supplementation Substudy.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with advanced liver disease often have vitamin D deficiency, but the daily dosages of vitamin D
objectiveWe aimed to establish the dose-response relationship between vitamin D
designAn open-label study of orally-administered vitamin D
resultsAmong the 48 patients, 39 (81%) had 25(OH)D > 20 ng/mL while on supplements, and none experienced hypercalcemia. The magnitude of the increase in 25(OH)D was approximately twofold greater in patients receiving the higher dose. The mean incremental increase was 5.1 ng/ml ± 3.9 of 25(OH)D per 1000 IU/d of vitamin D
conclusionsA two-tiered dosing regimen of daily oral vitamin D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.