ArticleGigaScience2024
Evaluation of Swin Transformer and knowledge transfer for denoising of super-resolution structured illumination microscopy data.
Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Interdisciplinary Nanomaterials for Biomedical Imaging and Sensing Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Based Image Restoration and Super-Resolution for Fluorescence Microscopy: Overview and Resources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Swin Transformer and knowledge transfer for denoising of super-resolution structured illumination microscopy data.GigaScience · 2024Article
- Image restoration in frequency space using complex-valued CNNs.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConvolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods have shown excellent performance in denoising and reconstruction of super-resolved structured illumination microscopy (SR-SIM) data. Therefore, CNN-based architectures have been the focus of existing studies. However, Swin Transformer, an alternative and recently proposed deep learning-based image restoration architecture, has not been fully investigated for denoising SR-SIM images. Furthermore, it has not been fully explored how well transfer learning strategies work for denoising SR-SIM images with different noise characteristics and recorded cell structures for these different types of deep learning-based methods. Currently, the scarcity of publicly available SR-SIM datasets limits the exploration of the performance and generalization capabilities of deep learning methods.
resultsIn this work, we present SwinT-fairSIM, a novel method based on the Swin Transformer for restoring SR-SIM images with a low signal-to-noise ratio. The experimental results show that SwinT-fairSIM outperforms previous CNN-based denoising methods. Furthermore, as a second contribution, two types of transfer learning-namely, direct transfer and fine-tuning-were benchmarked in combination with SwinT-fairSIM and CNN-based methods for denoising SR-SIM data. Direct transfer did not prove to be a viable strategy, but fine-tuning produced results comparable to conventional training from scratch while saving computational time and potentially reducing the amount of training data required. As a third contribution, we publish four datasets of raw SIM images and already reconstructed SR-SIM images. These datasets cover two different types of cell structures, tubulin filaments and vesicle structures. Different noise levels are available for the tubulin filaments.
conclusionThe SwinT-fairSIM method is well suited for denoising SR-SIM images. By fine-tuning, already trained models can be easily adapted to different noise characteristics and cell structures. Furthermore, the provided datasets are structured in a way that the research community can readily use them for research on denoising, super-resolution, and transfer learning strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.