Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38217407›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2024

Evaluation of Swin Transformer and knowledge transfer for denoising of super-resolution structured illumination microscopy data.

Zafran Hussain Shah, Marcel Müller, Wolfgang Hübner, Tung-Cheng Wang, Daniel Telman, Thomas Huser, Wolfram Schenck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Image restoration in frequency space using complex-valued CNNs.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zafran Hussain ShahFaculty of Engineering and Mathematics, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 33619 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8721-3882
Marcel MüllerFaculty of Physics, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2264-3643
Wolfgang HübnerFaculty of Physics, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1128-6468
Tung-Cheng WangFaculty of Physics, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Daniel TelmanFaculty of Engineering and Mathematics, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 33619 Bielefeld, Germany.
Thomas HuserFaculty of Physics, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2348-7416
Wolfram SchenckFaculty of Engineering and Mathematics, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 33619 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3300-2048

Funding

Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftHorizon 2020 642157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConvolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods have shown excellent performance in denoising and reconstruction of super-resolved structured illumination microscopy (SR-SIM) data. Therefore, CNN-based architectures have been the focus of existing studies. However, Swin Transformer, an alternative and recently proposed deep learning-based image restoration architecture, has not been fully investigated for denoising SR-SIM images. Furthermore, it has not been fully explored how well transfer learning strategies work for denoising SR-SIM images with different noise characteristics and recorded cell structures for these different types of deep learning-based methods. Currently, the scarcity of publicly available SR-SIM datasets limits the exploration of the performance and generalization capabilities of deep learning methods.

resultsIn this work, we present SwinT-fairSIM, a novel method based on the Swin Transformer for restoring SR-SIM images with a low signal-to-noise ratio. The experimental results show that SwinT-fairSIM outperforms previous CNN-based denoising methods. Furthermore, as a second contribution, two types of transfer learning-namely, direct transfer and fine-tuning-were benchmarked in combination with SwinT-fairSIM and CNN-based methods for denoising SR-SIM data. Direct transfer did not prove to be a viable strategy, but fine-tuning produced results comparable to conventional training from scratch while saving computational time and potentially reducing the amount of training data required. As a third contribution, we publish four datasets of raw SIM images and already reconstructed SR-SIM images. These datasets cover two different types of cell structures, tubulin filaments and vesicle structures. Different noise levels are available for the tubulin filaments.

conclusionThe SwinT-fairSIM method is well suited for denoising SR-SIM images. By fine-tuning, already trained models can be easily adapted to different noise characteristics and cell structures. Furthermore, the provided datasets are structured in a way that the research community can readily use them for research on denoising, super-resolution, and transfer learning strategies.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopyLightingNeural Networks, ComputerTubulinTubulinConvolutional neural networksDeep learningDenoisingFine-tuningFluorescence microscopyImage restorationStructured illumination microscopySwinIRSwin TransformerTransfer learningTransformer

Identifiers

PMID38217407
PMCPMC10787368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.