Observational studyUnited European gastroenterology journal2024
Clinical features and long-term outcomes of patients with type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis.
Observational study in United European gastroenterology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pancreatic Hyperenzymemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical Characterization and Outcomes from the European PANDORA Registry.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Article
- Autoimmune Pancreatitis Re-Classification with Novel Type AIP-4.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Association of Autoimmune Diseases With Pancreatic Cancer: A Nationwide Follow-Up Study From Sweden.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis in a Teenager With Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Report.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Acute Pancreatitis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results from the European Pandora Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Diagnostics for IgG4-Related Pancreatobiliary Diseases: Current Modalities and Clinical Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Chronic and Idiopathic Pancreatitis-A Personalized Treatment Approach.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Review
- Update on Autoimmune Pancreatitis and IgG4-Related Disease.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Review
- Response to "Is it time to revise criteria and treatment of type 2 AIP?"United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- Is it time to revise criteria and treatment of type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis?United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- Clinical features and long-term outcomes of patients with type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Observational
- Autoimmune pancreatitis-New evidence for clinical management strategies.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesType 2 is a rare form of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Despite being considered a benign disease, only few studies with limited sample size and short follow-up have been published on type 2 AIP. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate long-term outcomes, such as the risk of relapse, pancreatic insufficiency and cancer in a large type 2 AIP cohort with long follow-up.
methodsPatients with definitive or probable diagnosis of type 2 AIP by International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) present in our prospectively maintained database since 1995 at 31.12.2021 were identified. All patients were clinically evaluated during the year 2022. Clinical, radiological, serological, and pathological data were evaluated.
resultsEighty-eight out of 420 patients present in the database (21%) were diagnosed with type 2 AIP (mean age 33.5 ± 13.5 years). According to the ICDC, 21 patients (23.8%) had a definitive and 67 (76.2%) a probable diagnosis of type 2 AIP. The mean follow-up was 9.2 ± 7.1 years (range 1-27 years). No differences were observed when comparing patients with definitive and probable type 2 AIP diagnosis. Concomitant IBD was reported in 77 patients (87.5%). The probability of disease relapse was lower in patients treated with steroids versus surgery (at 5 years 13% vs. 33%; p = 0.038) but this difference was not statistically significant at multivariable analysis. The risk of endocrine or severe exocrine insufficiency was low (5% and 25%). Four extra-pancreatic malignancies (5%) were diagnosed, none pancreatic. One patient died in a car accident.
conclusionsType 2 AIP has benign long-term clinical outcomes. Mortality and cancer rates are low and no specific follow-up is needed after radiological remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.