ArticleKnee surgery & related research2024
Enhanced deep learning model enables accurate alignment measurement across diverse institutional imaging protocols.
Article in Knee surgery & related research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complementary roles of standing, supine, and valgus-stress whole-leg radiographs in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy planning: supine minimizes bias, whereas standing and valgus-stress reduce outliers.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in knee osteotomy: evolution of alignment assessment and surgical decision-making.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: Enhanced examinations, ambient intelligence and the future of clinical practice.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Review
- Dynamic changes to the tibiofemoral joint line with increasing osteoarthritis severity and its relationship to constitutional alignment : a radiological analysis of 3,320 knees.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Automated radiographic assessment of lower limb alignment using deep learning in a data-constrained clinical setting.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- An AI-based system for fully automated knee alignment assessment in standard AP knee radiographs.The Knee · 2025Article
- Do knee alignment patterns differ between Middle Eastern and East Asian populations? A propensity-matched analysis using artificial intelligence.Knee surgery & related research · 2025Article
- Association of radiographic structure deformity phenotypes of knee OA to clinical symptoms and risk for progression: Proposing a modification of Kellgren-Lawrence grade - Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative and the MOST study.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Reliably and Accurately Measure Lower Limb Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Review
- Evaluation of a deep learning software for automated measurements on full-leg standing radiographs.Knee surgery & related research · 2024Article
- Joint line and knee osteotomy.EFORT open reviews · 2024Review
- Automated analysis of knee joint alignment using detailed angular values in long leg radiographs based on deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAchieving consistent accuracy in radiographic measurements across different equipment and protocols is challenging. This study evaluates an advanced deep learning (DL) model, building upon a precursor, for its proficiency in generating uniform and precise alignment measurements in full-leg radiographs irrespective of institutional imaging differences.
methodsThe enhanced DL model was trained on over 10,000 radiographs. Utilizing a segmented approach, it separately identified and evaluated regions of interest (ROIs) for the hip, knee, and ankle, subsequently integrating these regions. For external validation, 300 datasets from three distinct institutes with varied imaging protocols and equipment were employed. The study measured seven radiologic parameters: hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, joint line convergence angle, weight-bearing line ratio, joint line obliquity angle, and lateral distal tibial angle. Measurements by the model were compared with an orthopedic specialist's evaluations using inter-observer and intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Additionally, the absolute error percentage in alignment measurements was assessed, and the processing duration for radiograph evaluation was recorded.
resultsThe DL model exhibited excellent performance, achieving an inter-observer ICC between 0.936 and 0.997, on par with an orthopedic specialist, and an intra-observer ICC of 1.000. The model's consistency was robust across different institutional imaging protocols. Its accuracy was particularly notable in measuring the hip-knee-ankle angle, with no instances of absolute error exceeding 1.5 degrees. The enhanced model significantly improved processing speed, reducing the time by 30-fold from an initial 10-11 s to 300 ms.
conclusionsThe enhanced DL model demonstrated its ability for accurate, rapid alignment measurements in full-leg radiographs, regardless of protocol variations, signifying its potential for broad clinical and research applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.