ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2024
Diagnostic accuracy of research criteria for prodromal frontotemporal dementia.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal order of clinical, imaging, and biomarker changes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration-associated syndromes.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Educational attainment and sex modulate clinical outcomes in genetic frontotemporal dementia.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Functional autonomy, comorbidities and cognitive decline: a mediation analysis in neurocognitive disorders.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Subtype-Specific Brain Atrophy and White Matter Alterations in Mild Cognitive Impairment.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Revised Diagnostic Criteria for Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia-The VasCog-2-WSO Criteria.JAMA neurology · 2025Article
- Combining plasma neurofilament light chain and frontotemporal atrophy improves differentiation of bvFTD from primary psychiatric disorders.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- The Diagnostic Landscape of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.Rhode Island medical journal (2013) · 2025Review
- Revised Diagnostic Criteria for Huntington Disease: What's It Gonna Take?Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- 2024 VCP International Conference: Exploring multi-disciplinary approaches from basic science of valosin containing protein, an AAA+ ATPase protein, to the therapeutic advancement for VCP-associated multisystem proteinopathy.Neurobiology of disease · 2025Review
- Frontoparietal network integrity supports cognitive function in pre-symptomatic frontotemporal dementia: Multimodal analysis of brain function, structure, and perfusion.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Blood-Based Biomarkers in Frontotemporal Dementia: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The Basis of Cognitive and Behavioral Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Brain and behavior · 2024Review
- Cognitive dispersion and its functional relevance in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and prodromal behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.Neuropsychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
48 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Genetic Frontotemporal Initiative Staging Group has proposed clinical criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal frontotemporal dementia (FTD), termed mild cognitive and/or behavioral and/or motor impairment (MCBMI). The objective of the study was to validate the proposed research criteria for MCBMI-FTD in a cohort of genetically confirmed FTD cases against healthy controls.
methodsA total of 398 participants were enrolled, 117 of whom were carriers of an FTD pathogenic variant with mild clinical symptoms, while 281 were non-carrier family members (healthy controls (HC)). A subgroup of patients underwent blood neurofilament light (NfL) levels and anterior cingulate atrophy assessment.
resultsThe core clinical criteria correctly classified MCBMI vs HC with an AUC of 0.79 (p < 0.001), while the addition of either blood NfL or anterior cingulate atrophy significantly increased the AUC to 0.84 and 0.82, respectively (p < 0.001). The addition of both markers further increased the AUC to 0.90 (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe proposed MCBMI criteria showed very good classification accuracy for identifying the prodromal stage of FTD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.