Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38216870›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Item distribution, internal consistency and structural validity of the German language person-centred climate questionnaire - staff version (PCQ-G-S): a cross-sectional study.

Denise Wilfling, Ralph Möhler, Almuth Berg, Jonas Dörner, Natascha Bartmann, Thomas Klatt, Gabriele Meyer, Margareta Halek, Sascha Köpke, Martin N Dichter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Person-centred environments and nursesFrontiers in health services · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Denise WilflingInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. denise.wilfling@uksh.de.
Ralph MöhlerInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Almuth BergInstitute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle- Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Jonas DörnerDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Witten, Germany.
Natascha BartmannInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas KlattInstitute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle- Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Gabriele MeyerInstitute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle- Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Margareta HalekSchool of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Sascha KöpkeInstitute of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin N DichterInstitute of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerson-centredness is considered as best practice for people living with dementia. A frequently used instrument to assess person-centredness of a care environment is the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire (PCQ). The questionnaire comprises of 14 items with the three subscales a climate of safety, a climate of everydayness and a climate of community.

aimThe aim of the study is to describe the translation process of the English language Person-centred Climate Questionnaire (Staff version, Patient version, Family version) into German language (PCQ-G) and to evaluate the first psychometric properties of the German language Person-centred Climate Questionnaire- Staff version (PCQ-G-S).

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study. The three versions of the 14-item English PCQ were translated into German language (PCQ-G) based on the recommendations for cross-cultural adaption of measures. Item distribution, internal consistency and structural validity of the questionnaire were assessed among nursing home staff (PCQ-G-S). Item distribution was calculated using descriptive statistics. Structural validity was tested using principal component analysis (PCA), and internal consistency was assessed for the resulting subscales using Cronbach's alpha. Data collection took place from May to September 2021.

resultsA total sample of 120 nurses was included in the data analysis. Nine out of 14 items of the PCQ-G-S demonstrated acceptable item difficulty, while five times showed a ceiling effect. The PCA analysis demonstrated a strong structural validity for a three-factor solution explaining 68.6% of the total variance. The three subscales demonstrated a good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha scores of 0.8 for each of the subscales.

conclusionThe analysis of the 14-item German version (PCQ-G-S) showed first evidence for a strong internal consistency and structural validity for evaluating staff perceptions of the person-centredness in German nursing homes. Based on this, further investigations for scale validity of the PCQ-G versions should be carried out.

Indexed as

LanguagePatient-Centered CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesDementiaInstrumentNursing homesPerson-centerednessPsychometric propertiesValidity

Identifiers

PMID38216870
PMCPMC10787414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.