ReviewBMC primary care2024
Barriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams: a narrative review of the literature using the consolidated framework for implementation research.
Review in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) in Africa: a systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Implementation of Expanding Primary Care Teams to Improve Anemia Diagnosis.Journal of primary care & community healthTrial
- Becoming Interprofessional: A Longitudinal Narrative Study of Professional and Interprofessional Identity Development Across Five Health Professions.Qualitative health research · 2026Article
- Longitudinal interprofessional education in health profession education: a scoping review.Korean journal of medical education · 2026Article
- Development and content validation of an interprofessional collaboration model for child sexual abuse prevention in primary health care.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Impact of grassroots development of interprofessional team-based practices: Retrospective matched cohort study using ICES data.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026Article
- Frozen in time: Breaking free from past family practice models.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026Article
- Models of care in Canadian hospitals: an exploration of current practice and future directions.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Strategies for Implementing Nursing Activities for Chronic Pain Management in Primary Care: Integrated Findings from a Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- Qualitative analysis of collaborative oral-health support during disaster response: experiences from the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2026Article
- Article
- Seeds of change: First assessment of an interprofessional training for medical and nursing students through INITIAL ("INnovative InTerprofessIonAl Learning in primary care"): A mixed-method evaluation.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Beyond silos: transdisciplinary collaboration for allied health clinicians providing stroke primary care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Core shared competencies between physicians and nurses in primary care: a Delphi study in Korea.Korean journal of medical education · 2025Article
- Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Concept Analysis.Journal of caring sciences · 2025Review
- Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Healthcare: A Qualitative Study of General Practitioners' and Family and Community Nurses' Perspectives in Italy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of interventions aimed at improving interprofessional collaboration: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Equipping Change Agents: Applying Mixed Methods to Learn About the Outcomes of the Co-Designed Caregiver-Centered Care Champions Education Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Understanding the experience of clinicians and non-clinical staff in Integrated Virtual Care, a hybrid primary care program in rural Ontario, Canada: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Workplace Strategies to Reduce Burnout in Veterinary Nurses and Technicians: A Delphi Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterprofessional primary care teams have been introduced across Canada to improve access (e.g., a regular primary care provider, timely access to care when needed) to and quality of primary care. However, the quality and speed of team implementation has not kept pace with increasing access issues. The aim of this research was to use an implementation framework to categorize and describe barriers and enablers to team implementation in primary care.
methodsA narrative review that prioritized systematic reviews and evidence syntheses was conducted. A search using pre-defined terms was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, and potentially relevant grey literature was identified through ad hoc Google searches and hand searching of health organization websites. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to categorize barriers and enablers into five domains: (1) Features of Team Implementation; (2) Government, Health Authorities and Health Organizations; (3) Characteristics of the Team; (4) Characteristics of Team Members; and (5) Process of Implementation.
resultsData were extracted from 19 of 435 articles that met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Most barriers and enablers were categorized into two domains of the CFIR: Characteristics of the Team and Government, Health Authorities, and Health Organizations. Key themes identified within the Characteristics of the Team domain were team-leadership, including designating a manager responsible for day-to-day activities and facilitating collaboration; clear governance structures, and technology supports and tools that facilitate information sharing and communication. Key themes within the Government, Health Authorities, and Health Organizations domain were professional remuneration plans, regulatory policy, and interprofessional education. Other key themes identified in the Features of Team Implementation included the importance of good data and research on the status of teams, as well as sufficient and stable funding models. Positive perspectives, flexibility, and feeling supported were identified in the Characteristics of Team Members domain. Within the Process of Implementation domain, shared leadership and human resources planning were discussed.
conclusionsBarriers and enablers to implementing interprofessional primary care teams using the CFIR were identified, which enables stakeholders and teams to tailor implementation of teams at the local level to impact the accessibility and quality of primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.