Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38216742›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2024

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Management of Endoleaks Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Joo-Young Chun, Michiel de Haan, Geert Maleux, Asaad Osman, Alessandro Cannavale, Robert Morgan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Endovascular Treatment of Type II Endoleaks: Update and Overview.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Joo-Young ChunSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. jooyoung.chun@stgeorges.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4147-4777
Michiel de HaanMaastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Geert MaleuxUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Asaad OsmanSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alessandro CannavalePoliclinico Umberto, Rome, Italy.
Robert MorganSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
St George's, University of London · GBKU Leuven · BEMaastricht University · NLPoliclinico Umberto I · ITSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoleaks represent the most common complication after EVAR. Some types are associated with ongoing risk of aneurysm rupture and necessitate long-term surveillance and secondary interventions. PURPOSE: This document, as with all CIRSE Standards of Practice documents, will recommend a reasonable approach to best practices of managing endoleaks. This will include imaging diagnosis, surveillance, indications for intervention, endovascular treatments and their outcomes. Our purpose is to provide recommendations based on up-to-date evidence, updating the guidelines previously published on this topic in 2013.

methodsThe writing group was established by the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee and consisted of clinicians with internationally recognised expertise in endoleak management. The writing group reviewed the existing literature performing a pragmatic evidence search using PubMed to select publications in English and relating to human subjects up to 2023. The final recommendations were formulated through consensus.

resultsEndoleaks may compromise durability of the aortic repair, and long-term imaging surveillance is necessary for early detection and correct classification to guide potential re-intervention. The majority of endoleaks that require treatment can be managed using endovascular techniques. This Standards of Practice document provides up-to-date recommendations for the safe management of endoleaks.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresEndoleakEndovascular Aneurysm RepairHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeEmbolisationEndoleak typesEndovascularEndovascular aneurysm repairImagingIndication for treatmentSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID38216742
PMCPMC10844414
OpenAlexW4390796873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.