Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38216631›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Different ways of evolving tool-using brains in teleosts and amniotes.

Pierre Estienne, Matthieu Simion, Hanako Hagio, Naoyuki Yamamoto, Arnim Jenett, Kei Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pierre EstienneParis-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience (NeuroPSI), Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR9197, Saclay, 91400, France.
Matthieu SimionTEFOR Paris-Saclay, CNRS UAR2010, Université Paris-Saclay, Saclay, 91400, France.
Hanako HagioLaboratory of Fish Biology, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2197-4595
Naoyuki YamamotoLaboratory of Fish Biology, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8705-6936
Arnim JenettTEFOR Paris-Saclay, CNRS UAR2010, Université Paris-Saclay, Saclay, 91400, France.
Kei YamamotoParis-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience (NeuroPSI), Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR9197, Saclay, 91400, France. kei.yamamoto@cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-8775-9022

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals and birds, tool-using species are characterized by their relatively large telencephalon containing a higher proportion of total brain neurons compared to other species. Some teleost species in the wrasse family have evolved tool-using abilities. In this study, we compared the brains of tool-using wrasses with various teleost species. We show that in the tool-using wrasses, the telencephalon and the ventral part of the forebrain and midbrain are significantly enlarged compared to other teleost species but do not contain a larger proportion of cells. Instead, this size difference is due to large fiber tracts connecting the dorsal part of the telencephalon (pallium) to the inferior lobe, a ventral mesencephalic structure absent in amniotes. The high degree of connectivity between these structures in tool-using wrasses suggests that the inferior lobe could contribute to higher-order cognitive functions. We conclude that the evolution of non-telencephalic structures might have been key in the emergence of these cognitive functions in teleosts.

Indexed as

Tool Use BehaviorAnimalsCerebral CortexMammalsMesencephalonProsencephalonTelencephalon

Identifiers

PMID38216631
PMCPMC10786859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.