Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38216577›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Production and characterization of human hair keratin bioplastic films with novel plasticizers.

Anand Shubha, Gupta Sharmita, Lakhani Anita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anand ShubhaDayalbagh Educational Institute, Dayalbagh, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, 282005, India.
Gupta SharmitaDayalbagh Educational Institute, Dayalbagh, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, 282005, India. drsharmitagupta123@gmail.com.
Lakhani AnitaDayalbagh Educational Institute, Dayalbagh, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, 282005, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since their invention, conventional plastics have contributed in the betterment of the society in numerous ways, nevertheless their deleterious impacts on the natural ecosystems and living creatures is irrefutable. The management of plastic waste generated is a concern worldwide and therefore quest for the plastic alternates or bioplastics is imminent. Here, we explore the suitability of keratin from human hair waste as the candidate for the production of bioplastic films. Keratin extracted from hair was used to form the films or 'kertics' by solution casting and curing. Ethanediol, di-ethylene glycol and tri-ethylene glycol were used as novel plasticizers along with glycerol in the keratin film formation. The film prepared were of the thickness 190-220 µm with the area of about 4.54 ± 0.2 cm

Indexed as

Keratins, Hair-SpecificPlasticizersBiopolymersEcosystemEthylene GlycolsGlycerolHumansBiopolymersEthylene GlycolsGlycerolKeratins, Hair-SpecificPlasticizers

Identifiers

PMID38216577
PMCPMC10786936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.