ArticleScientific reports2024
Analysis of maintaining human maximal voluntary contraction control strategies through the power grip task in isometric contraction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Power grip force is used as a representative indicator of the ability of the human neuromuscular system. However, people maintain the power grip force via different control strategies depending on the visual feedback that shows the magnitude of the force, the magnitude of the target grip force, and external disturbance. In this study, we investigated the control strategy of maintaining the power grip force in an isometric contraction depending on these conditions by expressing the power grip force as a person's Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVC). The participants were asked to maintain the MVC for each condition. Experimental results showed that humans typically control their MVC constant abilities based on proprioception, and maintaining the target MVC becomes relatively difficult as the magnitude of the target MVC increases. In addition, through interactions between the external disturbance and the target MVC, the MVC error increases when the target MVC increases and an external disturbance is applied. When the MVC error reaches a certain level, the offset effect is expressed through visual feedback, helping to reduce the MVC error and maintain it smoothly, revealing a person's MVC maintenance control strategy for each condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.