Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38216190›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

IMPAACT: IMproving the PArticipAtion of older people in policy decision-making on common health CondiTions - a study protocol.

Rachel C Ambagtsheer, Catherine J Hurley, Michael Lawless, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Renuka Visvanathan, Justin Beilby, Simon Stewart, Victoria Cornell, Matthew J Leach, Danielle Taylor and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Citizens' Jury as a Strategy to Increase Social Participation Among Older People.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Rachel C AmbagtsheerResearch Centre for Public Health, Equity and Human Flourishing, Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia rambagtsheer@torrens.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9391-6709
Catherine J HurleyHealth Vertical, Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Michael LawlessCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2536-6442
Annette Braunack-MayerSchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4427-0224
Renuka VisvanathanAged and Extended Care Services, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Basil Hetzel Institute, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Justin BeilbyHealth Vertical, Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Simon StewartInstitute of Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
Victoria CornellSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Matthew J LeachFaculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Danielle TaylorAdelaide Geriatrics Training and Research with Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Mark ThompsonAdelaide Geriatrics Training and Research with Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6420-4294
Elsa DentResearch Centre for Public Health, Equity and Human Flourishing, Torrens University Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lyn WhitewayLynda Whiteway, Consumer co-researcher, Kensington Gardens, South Australia, Australia.
Mandy ArchibaldCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4767-1031
Hannah M O'RourkeCollege of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Kathy WilliamsOffice for Ageing Well, SA Health Department for Health and Wellbeing, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Agnieszka ChudeckaMulticultural Aged Care SA Inc, Torrensville, South Australia, Australia.
Torrens University Australia · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUFaculty of Public Health · GBHealth Net · USOkinawa Prefectural College of Nursing · JPSA Health · AUThe University of Notre Dame Australia · AUUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRapid population ageing is a demographic trend being experienced and documented worldwide. While increased health screening and assessment may help mitigate the burden of illness in older people, issues such as misdiagnosis may affect access to interventions. This study aims to elicit the values and preferences of evidence-informed older people living in the community on early screening for common health conditions (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, dementia and frailty). The study will proceed in three Phases: (1) generating recommendations of older people through a series of Citizens' Juries; (2) obtaining feedback from a diverse range of stakeholder groups on the jury findings; and (3) co-designing a set of Knowledge Translation resources to facilitate implementation into research, policy and practice. Conditions were chosen to reflect common health conditions characterised by increasing prevalence with age, but which have been underexamined through a Citizens' Jury methodology. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be conducted in three Phases-(1) Citizens' Juries, (2) Policy Roundtables and (3) Production of Knowledge Translation resources. First, older people aged 50+ (n=80), including those from traditionally hard-to-reach and diverse groups, will be purposively recruited to four Citizen Juries. Second, representatives from a range of key stakeholder groups, including consumers and carers, health and aged care policymakers, general practitioners, practice nurses, geriatricians, allied health practitioners, pharmaceutical companies, private health insurers and community and aged care providers (n=40) will be purposively recruited for two Policy Roundtables. Finally, two researchers and six purposively recruited consumers will co-design Knowledge Translation resources. Thematic analysis will be performed on documentation and transcripts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained through the Torrens University Human Research Ethics Committee. Participants will give written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through development of a policy brief and lay summary, peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and seminars.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationDecision MakingAgedHumansPolicyPolicy MakingGERIATRIC MEDICINEMass ScreeningPrimary CarePrimary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID38216190
PMCPMC10806720
OpenAlexW4390848816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.