Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38216174›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2024

Eyecare practitioner perspectives and attitudes towards myopia and myopia management in the UK.

Sophie Coverdale, Lindsay Rountree, Kathryn Webber, Matthew Cufflin, Edward Mallen, Alison Alderson, Neema Ghorbani-Mojarrad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. IMI-Instrumentation for Myopia Management.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophie CoverdaleSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-0762-4963
Lindsay RountreeSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2667-1684
Kathryn WebberSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2672-9863
Matthew CufflinSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Edward MallenSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Alison AldersonSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Neema Ghorbani-MojarradSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK N.GhorbaniMojarrad@bradford.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9171-3070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMany children with progressive myopia are still prescribed single-vision correction. An investigation into UK eyecare practitioners' (ECPs) perceptions of myopia management was carried out to ascertain factors which may be limiting its implementation and uptake within clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Online focus groups were held with UK ECPs. Participants were encouraged to discuss their knowledge of the available myopia management options, their perception of how myopia management is being delivered in the UK and any barriers limiting ECPs' prescribing of these management options in practice. The discussions were transcribed and analysed thematically.

resultsFocus groups were held with 41 ECPs from primary and secondary eyecare. ECPs felt that provision of myopia management in the UK is variable. Most ECPs believe they have sufficient knowledge, but felt a lack of confidence in decision-making and practical experience. Less experienced ECPs sought more definitive guidance to support their decision-making. ECPs desired clarity on their duty of care obligations and were concerned over possible future litigation if they had not offered, or referred for, myopia management when indicated. The greatest barrier appears to be financial-treatment is expensive and ECPs are uncomfortable communicating this to parents. Many barriers were indicative of systemic problems within UK eyecare, such as commercial pressures, inadequate National Health Service funding and poor public awareness of paediatric eyecare.

conclusionMyopia management is not implemented consistently across the UK. To improve accessibility, changes are required at multiple levels, from individual ECPs through to wider stakeholders in UK eyecare provision.

Indexed as

Myopia, DegenerativeState MedicineAttitudeChildFocus GroupsHumansUnited KingdomMedical EducationMyopiaOptics and RefractionPublic healthTreatment otherVision

Identifiers

PMID38216174
PMCPMC10806590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.