Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38216134›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2024

Confirmation of the utility of the CA-125 elimination rate (KELIM) as an indicator of the chemosensitivity in advanced-stage ovarian cancer in a "real-life setting".

Lilian van Wagensveld, Olivier Colomban, Maaike A van der Aa, Gilles Freyer, Gabe S Sonke, Roy F P M Kruitwagen, Benoit You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Effect of Cancer Antigen-125 Elimination Rate Constant K andSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lilian van WagensveldDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4036-3554
Olivier ColombanFaculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1671-3470
Maaike A van der AaDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2934-2704
Gilles FreyerFaculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6001-164X
Gabe S SonkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8088-9628
Roy F P M KruitwagenGROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1305-9541
Benoit YouFaculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3177-8857

Funding

DCS IKNL2014-6838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM) has been validated as a marker of response to chemotherapy in >12,000 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) treated in first-line setting enrolled in >12 clinical trials. Patient KELIM is calculable online https://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/presentation. The objective was to investigate the prognostic value of KELIM in a large real-life national cancer registry with non-selected patients.

methodsWe investigated 4,025 EOC patients from the Netherlands Cancer Registry treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) ± followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Patient KELIM values were calculated in patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 measurements during NACT. KELIM was standardized with a pre-specified cut-off and scored as unfavorable/favorable (<1.0/≥1.0). KELIM's prognostic value regarding radiological response, completeness of IDS, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariate/multivariate analyses.

resultsThe data from 1,582 patients treated with heterogeneous chemotherapy regimens and sequences were assessable. KELIM was prognostic for radiological response and the likelihood of complete IDS after NACT (odds ratio=2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.04-3.29). Moreover, KELIM was independently associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.76; 95% CI=0.66-0.87), and OS (HR=0.79; 95% CI=0.69-0.91). Combining KELIM with the completeness of the IDS resulted in 3 prognostic groups (satisfactory, intermediate, and poor) with significant OS differences, namely a good, intermediate, and poor survival respectively.

conclusionThe value of KELIM, as a pragmatic indicator of response to chemotherapy, was maintained in a large real-life population-based cohort, highlighting its applicability in routine conditions.

Indexed as

CA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresNeoadjuvant TherapyOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenAntigen, CA-125KineticsModels, TheoreticalOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID38216134
PMCPMC11107274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.