Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38215687›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2024

Use of tele-nursing in primary care: A qualitative study on its negative and positive aspects.

Olga Navarro-Martínez, Antonio Martinez-Millana, Vicente Traver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga Navarro-MartínezDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Instituto ITACA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: olga.navarro@uv.es.
Antonio Martinez-MillanaInstituto ITACA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, Spain; Grup de Salut Digital CAMFIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Vicente TraverInstituto ITACA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the opinions of nursing professionals on the current limitations and future potential of digital tools in healthcare.

designQualitative and descriptive study. LOCATION: The study took place during an asynchronous MOODLE course on the use of ICT in healthcare, specifically aimed at nursing professionals.

participantsThe number of nurses enrolled in the course was 150.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted focusing on the positive and negative aspects that telenursing can offer in the context of a Moodle training in new technologies for nurses. A thematic analysis was carried out following the method proposed by Braun and Clarke.

resultsIn the end 68 nurses participated in the forum. Their statements, opinions and perceptions were analyzed and 28 descriptive codes were obtained and subsequently categorized into positive and negative aspects.

conclusionsNurses positively value the usefulness of digital tools and identify a wide range of benefits of telenursing in daily practice. At the same time, they point out crucial limitations that may slow down the adoption of telenursing, pointing to areas for improvement such as training and digital literacy of both patients and professionals. They consider that telenursing can humanise care, but insist on the need to prevent its use from increasing health inequalities.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursingTelemedicineTelenursingAtención primariaDigital technologiesICTPrimary careTecnologías digitalesTeleenfermeríaTelehealthTelenursingTelesaludTIC

Identifiers

PMID38215687
PMCPMC10827397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.