Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38215350›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2024

Utility of the Language Use Inventory in Young Children at Elevated Likelihood of Autism.

Jessica Blume, Meghan Miller, Daniela O'Neill, Ann M Mastergeorge, Sally Ozonoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica BlumeOffice of Global Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock.ORCID 0000-0002-4118-5780
Meghan MillerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis.
Daniela O'NeillDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Ann M MastergeorgeDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
Sally OzonoffDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis.

Funding

Infants at Risk of Autism: A Longitudinal StudyR01MH068398 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI OZONOFF, SALLY · 2003 to 2013
$6.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aims of this study were (a) to evaluate the convergent validity of the Language Use Inventory (LUI) with measures of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptoms, language, and social skills and (b) to assess discriminant validity of the LUI with measures of nonlanguage skills, including daily living skills and motor development.

methodThis study sample included participants from a longitudinal study (

resultsAll four language and social skill measures were moderately to strongly associated with each other and ASD symptom severity scores. The correlation between ADOS-2 comparison scores and LUI total scores was significantly stronger than ADOS-2 correlations with all other measures.

conclusionsOur findings provide support for the LUI as a feasible, pragmatic language-targeted instrument for inclusion in early developmental evaluations prompted by language concerns. Administration of the LUI may accelerate earlier referral for a comprehensive assessment of ASD symptoms. Given the high correlation with ADOS-2 scores, an LUI total score in a clinical range of concern may encourage a clinician to refer families for a full diagnostic evaluation of ASD.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantLanguageLongitudinal StudiesSocial Skills

Identifiers

PMID38215350
PMCPMC11000786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.