Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38215196›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Mathematical recapitulation of the end stages of human ovarian aging.

Sean D Lawley, Mary D Sammel, Nanette Santoro, Joshua Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Understanding the menopause journey.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sean D LawleyDepartment of Mathematics, University of Utah, 155 S 1400 E, JWB 233, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-026X
Mary D SammelDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1248-4199
Nanette SantoroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine (AMC) Building RC2, Room P15 3103, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9096-7490
Joshua JohnsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine (AMC) Building RC2, Room P15 3103, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6016-8089
University of Colorado Denver · USColorado School of Public Health · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian aging in women can be described as highly unpredictable within individuals but predictable across large populations. We showed previously that modeling an individual woman's ovarian reserve of primordial follicles using mathematical random walks replicates the natural pattern of growing follicles exiting the reserve. Compiling many simulations yields the observed population distribution of the age at natural menopause (ANM). Here, we have probed how stochastic control of primordial follicle loss might relate to the distribution of the preceding menopausal transition (MT), when women begin to experience menstrual cycle irregularity. We show that identical random walk model conditions produce both the reported MT distribution and the ANM distribution when thresholds are set for growing follicle availability. The MT and ANM are shown to correspond to gaps when primordial follicles fail to grow for 7 and 12 days, respectively. Modeling growing follicle supply is shown to precisely recapitulate epidemiological data and provides quantitative criteria for the MT and ANM in humans.

Indexed as

AgingOvaryFemaleHumansOvarian Follicle

Identifiers

PMID38215196
PMCPMC10786411
OpenAlexW4390817404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.