Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38215176›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Assessment of linear regression of peripapillary optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer measurements to forecast glacuoma trajectory.

Chris Bradley, Kaihua Hou, Patrick Herbert, Mathias Unberath, Greg Hager, Michael V Boland, Pradeep Ramulu, Jithin Yohannan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chris BradleyWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7663-6759
Kaihua HouMalone Center of Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5534-8341
Patrick HerbertMalone Center of Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Mathias UnberathMalone Center of Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Greg HagerMalone Center of Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Michael V BolandMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2506-7095
Pradeep RamuluWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jithin YohannanWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

A Comprehensive Strategy to Detect Glaucoma Worsening Earlier and With Fewer TestsK23EY032204 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI YOHANNAN, JITHIN · 2021 to 2025
$956k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY032204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linear regression of optical coherence tomography measurements of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is often used to detect glaucoma progression and forecast future disease course. However, current measurement frequencies suggest that clinicians often apply linear regression to a relatively small number of measurements (e.g., less than a handful). In this study, we estimate the accuracy of linear regression in predicting the next reliable measurement of average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using Zeiss Cirrus optical coherence tomography measurements of average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness from a sample of 6,471 eyes with glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect status. Linear regression is compared to two null models: no glaucoma worsening, and worsening due to aging. Linear regression on the first M ≥ 2 measurements was significantly worse at predicting a reliable M+1st measurement for 2 ≤ M ≤ 6. This range was reduced to 2 ≤ M ≤ 5 when retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements were first "corrected" for scan quality. Simulations based on measurement frequencies in our sample-on average 393 ± 190 days between consecutive measurements-show that linear regression outperforms both null models when M ≥ 5 and the goal is to forecast moderate (75th percentile) worsening, and when M ≥ 3 for rapid (90th percentile) worsening. If linear regression is used to assess disease trajectory with a small number of measurements over short time periods (e.g., 1-2 years), as is often the case in clinical practice, the number of optical coherence tomography examinations needs to be increased.

Indexed as

GlaucomaTomography, Optical CoherenceHumansIntraocular PressureLinear ModelsNerve FibersRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID38215176
PMCPMC10786363
OpenAlexW4390820957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.