Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38215081›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Intraorbital pressure-volume characteristics in a piglet model: In vivo pilot study.

Yasin Hamarat, Laimonas Bartusis, Vilma Putnynaite, Rolandas Zakelis, Mantas Deimantavicius, Vilma Zigmantaite, Ramunė Grigaleviciute, Audrius Kucinskas, Evaldas Kalvaitis, Arminas Ragauskas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yasin HamaratHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-1343-5068
Laimonas BartusisHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vilma PutnynaiteHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Rolandas ZakelisHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Mantas DeimantaviciusHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vilma ZigmantaiteBiological Research Center, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Ramunė GrigaleviciuteBiological Research Center, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Audrius KucinskasBiological Research Center, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Evaldas KalvaitisHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Arminas RagauskasHealth Telematics Science Institute, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Kaunas University of Technology · LTLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial pressure measurement is frequently used for diagnosis in neurocritical care but cannot always accurately predict neurological deterioration. Intracranial compliance plays a significant role in maintaining cerebral blood flow, cerebral perfusion pressure, and intracranial pressure. This study's objective was to investigate the feasibility of transferring external pressure into the eye orbit in a large-animal model while maintaining a clinically acceptable pressure gradient between intraorbital and external pressures. The experimental system comprised a specifically designed pressure applicator that can be placed and tightly fastened onto the eye. A pressure chamber made from thin, elastic, non-allergenic film was attached to the lower part of the applicator and placed in contact with the eyelid and surrounding tissues of piglets' eyeballs. External pressure was increased from 0 to 20 mmHg with steps of 1 mmHg, from 20 to 30 mmHg with steps of 2 mmHg, and from 30 to 50 mmHg with steps of 5 mmHg. An invasive pressure sensor was used to measure intraorbital pressure directly. An equation was derived from measured intraorbital and external pressures (intraorbital pressure = 0.82 × external pressure + 3.12) and demonstrated that external pressure can be linearly transferred to orbit tissues with a bias (systematic error) of 3.12 mmHg. This is close to the initial intraorbital pressure within the range of pressures tested. We determined the relationship between intraorbital compliance and externally applied pressure. Our findings indicate that intraorbital compliance can be controlled across a wide range of 1.55 to 0.15 ml/mmHg. We observed that external pressure transfer into the orbit can be achieved while maintaining a clinically acceptable pressure gradient between intraorbital and external pressures.

Indexed as

EyeOrbitAnimalsPilot ProjectsSwine

Identifiers

PMID38215081
PMCPMC10786399
OpenAlexW4390828059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.