ReviewPhysiological research2023
Methods of Cough Assessment and Objectivization.
Review in Physiological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06585332 (Hand Grip Strength As a Screening Tool for Respiratory Dysfunction in Huntington's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hand Grip Strength As a Screening Tool for Respiratory Dysfunction in Huntington's Disease
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Cough in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Zihua Wenfei Zhisou Granule in Treatment of Postinfectious Cough: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Clinical Trial.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2025Trial
- Reduced cough severity and improved confidence in self-management following completion of a Virtual Physiotherapy Group Intervention for Chronic Cough: ViP-Cough.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Beyond codeine - the evidence landscape of conventional, natural, and emerging antitussive therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- The central regulatory network of cough: a cornerstone of cough management.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Safety and efficacy evaluation of low-dose of esketamine combined with propofol for painless gastroscopy: a single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cough is one of the most important airway defensive reflexes aimed at removing foreign particles or endogenously produced materials from the airways and provides protection against aspiration. Generally considered, cough is a vital physiological defensive mechanism for lung health. However, in case of cough dysregulation this reflex can become pathological and leads to an adverse influence on daily life. Therefore, it is necessary to effectively evaluate the severity of cough for its diagnosis and treatment. There are subjective and objective methods for assessing cough. These methods should help describe the heterogeneity of cough phenotypes and may establish better treatment by monitoring response to nonpharmacological or pharmacological therapies. It is important to keep in mind that the clinical assessment of cough should include both tools that measure the amount and severity of the cough. The importance of a combined subjective and objective evaluation for a comprehensive assessment of cough has been advocated in the guidelines of the European Respiratory Society on cough evaluation. This review article provides an overview of subjective and objective methods for assessing and monitoring cough in children and adults comparing to animal models. Key words Cough frequency; Cough intensity; Cough reflex sensitivity; Cough monitors; Cough assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38215057PMC10805254What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.