Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38214953›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

The Effects of the Processing of Positive Memories Technique on Posttrauma Affect and Cognitions Among Survivors of Trauma: Protocol for a Daily Diary Study.

Talya Greene, Ateka A Contractor, Sheila Daniela Dicker-Oren, Andrea Fentem, Sharon R Sznitman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06680193 (Daily Affect and Cognition Impacts of Processing of Positive Memories Technique), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06680193 nacompletednot on this map

Daily Affect and Cognition Impacts of Processing of Positive Memories Technique (PPMT) in a Trauma-Exposed Community Sample

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Texas, Denton, TXRan2022 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsPost-Traumatic Stress DisorderArmsProcessing of Positive Memories Technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Talya Greene *Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3044-2841
Ateka A Contractor *Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3032-4578
Sheila Daniela Dicker-OrenDepartment of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7584-4123
Andrea FentemDepartment of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9347-7358
Sharon R SznitmanSchool of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9398-0727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Processing of Positive Memories Technique (PPMT) is a promising new treatment approach for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which involves detailed narration and processing of specific positive autobiographical memories. Indeed, preliminary case-series studies have found reductions in PTSD symptoms, negative affect, and negative cognitions among survivors of trauma who have received PPMT. However, PPMT's effects have not been investigated at the daily level. In this study, we describe the protocol for a study that will examine the daily-level impacts of PPMT in a trauma-exposed, nonclinical community sample.

objectiveThis study uses an innovative research protocol that combines case-series design and daily diary approaches to examine changes in daily affect, daily cognitions, and daily PTSD symptoms pre- and post-PPMT. We hypothesize that at the daily level, in comparison to their own pre-PPMT levels, following the PPMT intervention, participants will report (1) a lower count of endorsed daily PTSD symptoms, (2) increases in daily positive affect and decreases in daily negative affect, (3) increases in positive affect reactivity to daily positive events, and (4) decreases in daily posttrauma cognitions.

methodsWe are currently recruiting participants (target n=70) from a metroplex in the southwest United States. Following a screening survey, eligible participants complete a preintervention baseline survey, followed by 21 daily surveys in their natural environments. Then, they receive 4 PPMT sessions on a weekly basis. After the conclusion of the PPMT intervention, participants complete a postintervention outcome survey and 21 daily surveys. To compare daily affect, daily cognitions, and daily PTSD symptoms before and after PPMT, we will use the daily diary report data and conduct multilevel random intercepts and slopes linear regression models.

resultsData collection was initiated in March 2022 and is expected to end by June 2024. As of November 28, 2023, a total of 515 participants had consented to the study in the screening phase. No analyses will be conducted until data collection has been completed.

conclusionsStudy findings could clarify whether deficits in positive autobiographical memory processes may also characterize PTSD alongside deficits in traumatic memory processes. Furthermore, PPMT could be an additional therapeutic tool for clinicians to help clients reduce posttraumatic distress in their everyday lives. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/51838.

Indexed as

affectcase series designcognitionsexperience samplingintensive longitudinal assessmentpositive autobiographical memoriesposttrauma healthposttraumatic stress disordertrauma survivors

Identifiers

PMID38214953
PMCPMC10818235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.