Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38214879›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024

Prolymphocytic Leukaemia: an Update on Biology and Treatment.

Dima El-Sharkawi, Claire Dearden

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dima El-SharkawiRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. dima.el-sharkawi@rmh.nhs.uk.
Claire DeardenRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review summarises the recent advances in knowledge regarding the biology and treatment of prolymphocytic leukaemias. RECENT

findingsBoth B-PLL and T-PLL are genetically complex, and the molecular landscape of these diseases has been well characterised recently. Diagnostic criteria for T-PLL have been refined with the publication of the first international consensus criteria, whereas the diagnosis of B-PLL has been thrown into question by the most recent WHO classification. Treatment advances in B-PLL have relied heavily on the advances seen in CLL that have then been extrapolated to B-PLL with just a few case reports to support the use of these targeted inhibitors. Despite increased knowledge of the biology of T-PLL and some elegant pre-clinical models to identify potential treatments, unfortunately, no improvements have been made in the treatment of T-PLL. Unmet need is a term oft used for many diseases, but this is particularly true for patients with prolymphocytic leukaemias. Ongoing improvements in our understanding of these diseases will hopefully lead to improved therapies in the future.

Indexed as

Leukemia, ProlymphocyticBiologyHumansB-PLLProlymphocyticSBLPNT-PLL

Identifiers

PMID38214879
OpenAlexW4390794675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.