Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38214841›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2024

Preliminary reading of antibiogram by microdilution for clinical isolates in urine culture.

Enrique Rodríguez-Guerrero, José Moya-López, Manuela Expósito-Ruiz, José María Navarro-Marí, José Gutiérrez-Fernández

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep Learning-Based Rapid Identification ofRisk management and healthcare policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enrique Rodríguez-GuerreroLaboratory of Microbiology, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital & Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada (Ibs.GRANADA), 18016, Granada, Spain. enriquerg83@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5185-3247
José Moya-LópezDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada & Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada (Ibs.GRANADA), 18016, Granada, Spain.
Manuela Expósito-RuizUnit of Biostatistics, Department of Statistics, School of Medicine, University of Granada & Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada (Ibs.GRANADA), 18016, Granada, Spain.
José María Navarro-MaríLaboratory of Microbiology, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital & Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada (Ibs.GRANADA), 18016, Granada, Spain.
José Gutiérrez-FernándezLaboratory of Microbiology, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital & Biosanitary Research Institute of Granada (Ibs.GRANADA), 18016, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated a modification of automated antibiograms in urine cultures designed to facilitate the early interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and accelerate the targeted treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs),

methodsA prospective study was conducted of 309 isolates (219 Enterobacteriaceae, 75 Enterococcus spp., and 15 non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB), and a retrospective study of 9 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates from urine cultures. Colonies grown on conventional isolation plates were inoculated in MicroScan Walkaway system panels and incubated for 7 h, using a MicroScan AutoScan-4 plate reader for preliminary MIC determination by turbidimetry. Resulting antibiograms were compared with definitive antibiograms obtained after incubation for 17 h.

resultsPreliminary and definitive readings were concordant for 86.7% of Gram-positive cocci isolates (65/75), 61.6% of Enterobacteriaceae (135/219), and 53.3% of NFGNB. The agreement rate was greater than 90% for most antimicrobials against Gram-positive cocci (94.7% or more) and Enterobacteriaceae, (97.2% or more for 10 of 17 antibiotics) except with nitrofurantoin (89%). The agreement rate was 86.7% or more for most antibiotics against NFGNB apart from piperacillin/tazobactam, aztreonam, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin. Gram-negative bacilli showed the highest differences in MIC values between preliminary and definitive readings.

conclusionsA preliminary antibiogram reading may be useful in urine cultures to reduce the delay before targeted antibiotherapy, especially against Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-positive cocci, but not in cases of carbapenemase-producing NFGNB. Further local studies are warranted to evaluate the usefulness of this approach in relation to resistance rates.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsGram-Negative BacteriaEnterobacteriaceaeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsMicroScan WalkawayPreliminary readingRapid antibiogramUrinary tract infectionUrine culture

Identifiers

PMID38214841
OpenAlexW4390792372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.