SynthesisCerebellum (London, England)2024
Patient-Related Outcome Measures for Oculomotor Symptoms in the Cerebellar Ataxias: Insights from Non-Cerebellar Disorders.
Synthesis in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of the SODA in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of Scales to Assess Different Types of Ataxia: Meta-review.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with cerebellar ataxia (CA), symptoms related to oculomotor dysfunction significantly affect quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to analyze the literature on patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) assessing QoL impacts of vestibular and cerebellar oculomotor abnormalities in patients with CA to identify the strengths and limitations of existing scales and highlight any areas of unmet need. A systematic review was conducted (Medline, Embase) of English-language original articles reporting on QoL measures in patients with vertigo, dizziness or CA. Pre-specified parameters were retrieved, including diseases studied, scales applied and conclusions drawn. Our search yielded 3671 articles of which 467 studies (n = 111,606 participants) were deemed relevant. The most frequently studied disease entities were (a) non-specific dizziness/gait imbalance (114 studies; 54,581 participants), (b) vestibular schwannomas (66; 15,360), and (c) vestibular disorders not further specified (66; 10,259). The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) was the most frequently used PROM to assess QoL (n = 91,851), followed by the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale (n = 12,027) and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (n = 2'471). QoL-scores capturing symptoms related to oculomotor abnormalities in CA were rare, focused on visual impairments (e.g., National-Eye-Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, Oscillopsia Functional Impact, oscillopsia severity score) and were unvalidated. The DHI remains the most widely used and versatile scale for evaluating dizziness. A lack of well-established PROMs for assessing the impact of oculomotor-related symptoms on QoL in CA was noted, emphasizing the need for developing and validating a new QoL-score dedicated to the oculomotor domain for individuals with CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.