Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38214774›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2024

Towards formal models of inhibitory mechanisms involved in motor imagery: a commentary on Bach et al. (2022).

Ladislas Nalborczyk, Marieke Longcamp, Thibault Gajdos, Mathieu Servant, F-Xavier Alario

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ladislas NalborczykAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France. ladislas.nalborczyk@gmail.com.
Marieke LongcampAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.
Thibault GajdosAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.
Mathieu ServantUniv Franche Comté, INSERM, LINC, Besançon, France.
F-Xavier AlarioAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CONV-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vast body of research suggests that the primary motor cortex is involved in motor imagery. This raises the issue of inhibition: how is it possible for motor imagery not to lead to motor execution? Bach et al. (Psychol Res Psychol Forschung. 10.1007/s00426-022-01773-w, 2022, this issue) suggest that the motor execution threshold may be "upregulated" during motor imagery to prevent execution. Alternatively, it has been proposed that, in parallel to excitatory mechanisms, inhibitory mechanisms may be actively suppressing motor output during motor imagery. These theories are verbal in nature, with well-known limitations. Here, we describe a toy-model of the inhibitory mechanisms thought to be at play during motor imagery to start disentangling predictions from competing hypotheses.

Indexed as

ImaginationInhibition, PsychologicalMotor CortexHumansMotor ActivityPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.