ReviewThe American surgeon2024
Practices of Adult Spine Immobilization During Trauma Resuscitation: Proposal for Improved Guidelines.
Review in The American surgeon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis narrative review aims to evaluate the impact of current spinal immobilization practices on clinical outcomes in adult trauma patients with suspected or confirmed spinal injury to direct the creation of improved practice management guidelines.
methodsPubMed, ProQuest, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were searched for studies that evaluated the impact of spine immobilization practices during resuscitation in adult trauma patients and reported associated clinical outcomes. Outcomes included neurological deficits, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS), ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS), discharge disposition, long-term functional status (modified Rankin scale), vascular injury rate, and respiratory injury rate.
resultsNine studies were included in this review, divided into two groups based on patient immobilization status. Patients compared with and without cervical immobilization had higher mortality, longer ICU-LOS, and a higher incidence of neurological deficits if immobilized. Immobilization only was associated with a higher incidence of indirect neurological injury and poor functional outcomes.
conclusionSpinal immobilization during resuscitation in adult trauma patients is associated with a higher risk of neurological injury, in-hospital mortality, and longer ICU-LOS. Further research is needed to provide strong evidence for spinal immobilization guidelines and identify the optimal method and timing for immobilization practices in trauma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38214650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.