ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Less-is-more: selecting transcription factor binding regions informative for motif inference.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From knowledge graph to topological data analysis: a novel framework to analyze gene regulatory networks for tomato-multi-pathogen interactions.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Article
- Benchmarking transcription factor binding site prediction models: a comparative analysis on synthetic and biological data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Binding profiles for 961Genome research · 2024Article
- A single-cell multimodal view on gene regulatory network inference from transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Building integrative functional maps of gene regulation.Human molecular genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous statistical methods have emerged for inferring DNA motifs for transcription factors (TFs) from genomic regions. However, the process of selecting informative regions for motif inference remains understudied. Current approaches select regions with strong ChIP-seq signal for a given TF, assuming that such strong signal primarily results from specific interactions between the TF and its motif. Additionally, these selection approaches do not account for non-target motifs, i.e. motifs of other TFs; they presume the occurrence of these non-target motifs infrequent compared to that of the target motif, and thus assume these have minimal interference with the identification of the target. Leveraging extensive ChIP-seq datasets, we introduced the concept of TF signal 'crowdedness', referred to as C-score, for each genomic region. The C-score helps in highlighting TF signals arising from non-specific interactions. Moreover, by considering the C-score (and adjusting for the length of genomic regions), we can effectively mitigate interference of non-target motifs. Using these tools, we find that in many instances, strong ChIP-seq signal stems mainly from non-specific interactions, and the occurrence of non-target motifs significantly impacts the accurate inference of the target motif. Prioritizing genomic regions with reduced crowdedness and short length markedly improves motif inference. This 'less-is-more' effect suggests that ChIP-seq region selection warrants more attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.