Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38214130›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2024

Establishing a robust radioligand therapy program: A practical approach for North American centers.

Erik S Mittra, Rebecca K S Wong, Celeste Winters, Adam Brown, Shondra Murley, Hagen Kennecke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tetraspanin-8 as a Tumor-Selective Immuno-PET Target in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Framework to calculateMedical physics · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erik S MittraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Rebecca K S WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Celeste WintersDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Adam BrownDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Shondra MurleyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, West Tennessee Healthcare, Jackson, Tennessee, USA.
Hagen KenneckeProvidence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radioligand therapy (RLT) is a targeted approach to treating cancer that has been shown to be safe and effective in a variety of disease states, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, lymphoma, and most recently, advanced prostate cancer. In the United States, patient access to this therapy is currently variable. Implementation of new RLT programs and expansion of existing programs are needed to broaden patient access to and standardize the delivery of RLT, especially as new therapies are introduced into clinical practice. Drawing from experience in establishing RLT programs in different settings, we have developed practical recommendations for building and implementing a robust RLT program. In this review, we present our recommendations for minimal requirements and optimal requirements, as well as system considerations, and special issues associated with implementing an RLT program in North American centers.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNorth AmericaRacial Groupsnuclear medicineprogram implementationradioligand therapyradiopharmaceuticalstheranostics

Identifiers

PMID38214130
PMCPMC10905220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.