Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38214065›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2024

Unmasking patient diversity: Exploring cognitive and antidepressive effects of electroconvulsive therapy.

Kjersti Sellevåg, Christoffer A Bartz-Johannessen, Ketil J Oedegaard, Axel Nordenskjöld, Christine Mohn, Jeanette S Bjørke, Ute Kessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Electroconvulsive therapy and autobiographical memory.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kjersti SellevågNKS Olaviken Gerontopsychiatric Hospital, Askøy, Norway.ORCID 0009-0007-2116-8063
Christoffer A Bartz-JohannessenDepartment of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9615-4551
Ketil J OedegaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3362-4317
Axel NordenskjöldThe University Health Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7454-3065
Christine MohnNorwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jeanette S BjørkePsychiatric Division, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0983-088X
Ute KesslerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2002-5518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an established treatment for depression, but more data on effectiveness and safety in clinical practice is needed. The aim of this register-based study was to investigate short-term effectiveness and cognitive safety after ECT, evaluated by clinicians and patients. Secondary, we investigated predictors for remission and cognitive decline.

methodsThe study included 392 patients from the Regional Register for Neurostimulation Treatment in Western Norway. Depressive symptoms and cognitive function were assessed with Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination (clinician-rated) and Beck Depression Inventory and Everyday Memory Questionnaire (patient-rated). Assessments were done prior to ECT-series and a mean of 1.7 days after (range 6 days before and 12 days after) end of ECT-series. Paired samples

resultsClinician- and patient-rated remission rates were 49.5 and 41.0%, respectively. There was a large reduction in depressive symptoms and a small improvement in cognition after ECT, but we also identified subgroups with non-response of ECT in combination with cognitive decline (4.6% clinician-rated, 15.7% patient-rated). Positive predictors for patient- and clinician-rated remission were increasing age, shorter duration of depressive episode, and psychotic features. Antipsychotic medication at the commencement of treatment and previous ECT-treatment gave higher odds of clinician-rated remission, whereas higher pretreatment subjective depression level was associated with lower odds for patient-rated remission. Clinician-rated cognitive decline was predicted by higher pretreatment MMSE scores, whereas psychotic features, increasing age, and greater pretreatment subjective memory concerns were associated with lower odds for patient-rated cognitive decline.

conclusionsOur study supports ECT as an effective and safe treatment, although subgroups have a less favorable outcome. ECT should be considered at an early stage for older patients suffering from depression with psychotic features. Providing comprehensive and balanced information from clinicians and patients perspectives on effects and side effects, may assist in a joint consent process.

Indexed as

Electroconvulsive TherapyAntidepressive AgentsCognitionHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsDepressionECT cognitive outcomesECT effectivenessElectroconvulsive therapyNeurostimulation treatmentPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID38214065
PMCPMC10964271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.