Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213939›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Impact of Stoma Baseplate Convexity on Tension and Compression Around the Stoma Site: A Finite Element Analysis.

Jonathan Waller, Philip Gowans, Suzanne Lord, Katie McGill

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Computer-Simulated Model Examining the Effects of Convexity Characteristics at the Skin Barrier- Abdomen Interface.Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan WallerEngineering, Kinneir Dufort Design Ltd., Bristol, GBR.
Philip GowansOstomy Care, Convatec Ltd., Deeside, GBR.
Suzanne LordOstomy Care, Convatec Ltd., Lexington, USA.
Katie McGillEngineering, Kinneir Dufort Design Ltd., Bristol, GBR.
ConvaTec (United Kingdom) · GBMechanical Design (Slovakia) · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients living with intestinal or urinary stomas, skin barriers play an essential role in protecting the peristomal skin and preventing peristomal complications. Convex baseplates press into the peristomal skin and are suitable for retracted stomas that do not protrude, peristomal skin with creases, folds, or dips, and stomas where frequent leaking can occur with flat pouching systems. However, there is a lack of data on the magnitude and location of tension applied to the abdomen by convex baseplates. We evaluated the impact of a range of convex baseplates applied to a simulated stoma site. A comparative finite element analysis investigation was conducted to evaluate the impact of eight different convex stoma system baseplates applied to an idealised flat abdomen, representing skin, subcutaneous tissue, and musculature layers. The baseplates considered had varying convexity with depths of 3.5 mm and 7 mm and internal structural diameters between ~30 mm and ~60 mm. The convex product range provided tension in the skin (maximum principal strain) and compression through the fat layer (minimum principal strain). Large differences in the locations and magnitudes of skin tension and fat layer compression were seen between the baseplates under analysis, with both the depth and diameter of convexity influencing the strain experienced across the abdominal topography. The results generated highlight the importance of having an appropriate range of convexity products available and selecting an appropriate option for use based on the stoma type and condition of the peristomal skin.

Indexed as

compressionconvexityfinite elementintestinal stomasostomy carestomatensionurinary stomaswound care

Identifiers

PMID38213939
PMCPMC10783598
OpenAlexW4390754979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.