Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38213884›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity with deep learning.

Yuxiao Wang, Qihong Jiao, Jingxuan Wang, Xiaojun Cai, Wei Zhao, Xuefeng Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Machine Learning to Predict CDK4 Inhibition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuxiao WangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China.
Qihong JiaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China.
Jingxuan WangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China.
Xiaojun CaiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China.
Wei ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China.
Xuefeng CuiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of binding affinities between target proteins and small molecule drugs is essential for speeding up the drug research and design process. To attain precise and effective affinity prediction, computer-aided methods are employed in the drug discovery pipeline. In the last decade, a variety of computational methods has been developed, with deep learning being the most commonly used approach. We have gathered several deep learning methods and classified them into convolutional neural networks (CNNs), graph neural networks (GNNs), and Transformers for analysis and discussion. Initially, we conducted an analysis of the different deep learning methods, focusing on their feature construction and model architecture. We discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each model. Subsequently, we conducted experiments using four deep learning methods on the PDBbind v.2016 core set. We evaluated their prediction capabilities in various affinity intervals and statistically and visually analyzed the samples of correct and incorrect predictions for each model. Through visual analysis, we attempted to combine the strengths of the four models to improve the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of predicted affinities by 1.6% (reducing the absolute value to 1.101) and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (R) by 2.9% (increasing the absolute value to 0.894) compared to the current state-of-the-art method. Lastly, we discussed the challenges faced by current deep learning methods in affinity prediction and proposed potential solutions to address these issues.

Indexed as

Assemble modelBinding affinity predictionDeep learningProtein-ligand affinity

Identifiers

PMID38213884
PMCPMC10782002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.